search for: treeconnect

...ave different passwords. 1. Using the standard mount command and specifying cifs as the fs, mount the first share (it doesn't matter which one you pick). If you watch the ethereal traffic, pay attention to (what I presume is the encrypted form of) the password that gets sent as part of the TreeConnect AndX Request packet. Let's call this hexadecimal password string "A". 2. Now attempt to mount the second share using the mount command as well. This will fail with an "Operation not permitted" error, and ethereal traffic will show the server responded with STATUS_WRONG_P...

...t a simple PHP script which is using psexec from sysinternals to execute commands on a remote machine (which uses SMB under the hood). If I run it from DOS it works fine. If I run the same script via apache it hangs. Fired up Wireshark and had a look at what was going on. In the working version the treeconnect calls go to the IPC$ and then the ADMIN$ accounts on the remote machine. On the non-working version only treeconnect to ADMIN$ is sent. This is weird as both times the script is executed using the same user account on the local machine (checked by shelling-out to call 'whoami' which returns...

...ysv doing parameter load printers = yes doing parameter guest account = nobody doing parameter log file = /opt/samba/log doing parameter log level = 1 Server time is Thu Oct 8 21:32:40 1998 Timezone is UTC-5.0 security=user SMBtconX failed. ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a TreeConnect or Session Setup are invalid.) Perhaps you are using the wrong sharename, username or password? Suggestions or observation would be most welcome... Dan Dan Mandell <dmandell@saintmarys.edu> Saint Mary's College. Information technology Phone: (219) 284-4610 / Fax: (219) 284-4716

...11.0, and MPE/iX, so no SMBMount for me. But Steve's idea that an update to files on the smbserver during a period of inactivity on the smbclient being involved led me to question if this could be an issue with the 'change notify' NT Transact mechanism; Some clients, when doing a treeconnect to an smbshare, will then send an NT Transact smb with a function code (I think '4', don't remember at the moment) called 'change notify'. The smb server, if it supports it, then will keep this machine in a list to 'notify' via an 'notify change' nt transact...

...ith "server max protocol = SMB2_02". * BUG 12788: auth/spnego: Fix gensec_update_ev() argument order for the SPNEGO_FALLBACK case. * BUG 12832: s3:smb2_create: Avoid reusing the 'tevent_req' within smbd_smb2_create_send(). * BUG 12844: Related requests with TreeConnect fail with NETWORK_NAME_DELETED. * BUG 12845: Related requests with SessionSetup fail with INTERNAL_ERROR. * BUG 12859: ldb: protect Samba < 4.7 against incompatible ldb versions and require ldb < 1.2.0. * BUG 12862: auth/ntlmssp: Enforce NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 for the NTLM...

...ith "server max protocol = SMB2_02". * BUG 12788: auth/spnego: Fix gensec_update_ev() argument order for the SPNEGO_FALLBACK case. * BUG 12832: s3:smb2_create: Avoid reusing the 'tevent_req' within smbd_smb2_create_send(). * BUG 12844: Related requests with TreeConnect fail with NETWORK_NAME_DELETED. * BUG 12845: Related requests with SessionSetup fail with INTERNAL_ERROR. * BUG 12859: ldb: protect Samba < 4.7 against incompatible ldb versions and require ldb < 1.2.0. * BUG 12862: auth/ntlmssp: Enforce NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_NTLM2 for the NTLM...

...nt for > me. But Steve's idea that an update to files on the smbserver during a > period > of inactivity on the smbclient being involved led me to question if this > could > be an issue with the 'change notify' NT Transact mechanism; Some > clients, when > doing a treeconnect to an smbshare, will then send an NT Transact smb > with a > function code (I think '4', don't remember at the moment) called 'change > > notify'. The smb server, if it supports it, then will keep this machine > in a > list to 'notify' via an 'noti...

>From my investigations, and searching the archives, it seems that smbfs can only mount shares, and not directories under the share i.e. smbmount //host/share /mnt works smbmount //host/share/directory /mnt doesn't work Our W2K3 server has user home directories in a tree where there are no user rights to the next node up the tree (level1), which is the directory on the share, i.e.

> > When you provide an exact vers= then no auto-negotiation happens (unless > you pass "vers=3" which essentially means 3.x: use 3.0 or above). You > either get the connection or mount fails. None the less, you can dump > the current SMB ressources managed by the kernel by looking at > /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData if your kernel is recent enough it should show > the SMB

...o, and Hagen Völzer, 2010 > > A very recent paper, that gives us high resolution SESE regions ('simple' and 'refined' and even a little bit more) in linear time. > They state this algorithm is simpler than the previous. Basically, it seems to be equivalent to calculate the treeconnected components. > > 2) Code Compaction of Matching Single-Entry Multiple-Exit Regions (2003) > Cached > Wen-ke Chen , Bengu Li , Rajiv Gupta, 2003 > > I missed this one earlier. They calculate SEME regions based on the control dependence graph. > > I am currently a litt...