Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "tree_public".
2008 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
....c that was not conditioned on being on darwin:
+ /* The "make_assemble_visibility" method may issue a warning if the visibility
+ attribute isn't supported in a configuration. This is all done through a
+ call-back. We want to issue this same warning when needed. */
+ if (TREE_PUBLIC (decl))
+ maybe_assemble_visibility (decl);
It seems suspicious.
Ciao,
Duncan.
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
...; darwin:
>
> + /* The "make_assemble_visibility" method may issue a warning if
> the visibility
> + attribute isn't supported in a configuration. This is all done
> through a
> + call-back. We want to issue this same warning when needed. */
> + if (TREE_PUBLIC (decl))
> + maybe_assemble_visibility (decl);
>
> It seems suspicious.
It does seem odd, what was the reason for the change?
-eric
2006 Sep 01
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
...d.
I'm looking into the errors, and I'll update the list on any progress.
Index: gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c (revision 160)
+++ gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c (working copy)
@@ -713,7 +713,11 @@
TREE_PUBLIC (decl) = 1;
if (library_name)
SET_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl, get_identifier (library_name));
+#ifndef ENABLE_LLVM
make_decl_rtl (decl);
+#else
+ make_decl_llvm (decl);
+#endif
pushdecl (decl);
DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (decl) = class;
DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) = function_code;
Index:...
2008 Feb 06
0
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On 2/6/08, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:18 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> if /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/xgcc -B/
> >> s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/
> >> local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/
>
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
> Hi, I have a first quick patch and a question. The patch links f951
> with g++ when LLVM is enabled. It's at the end of this email.
Thanks, applied!
> I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them
> like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to
> the tree. I'd like to
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
Hi, I have a first quick patch and a question. The patch links f951
with g++ when LLVM is enabled. It's at the end of this email.
I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them
like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to
the tree. I'd like to make it as easy as possible to apply these, so
let me know any rules I should be following.
2008 Feb 06
6
[LLVMdev] strange visibility error when compiling llvm-gcc-4.2
On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:18 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> if /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/xgcc -B/
>> s/llvm/obj.gcc42/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/
>> local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/
>> include -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -
>> DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.