search for: tree04

...ew of merge Hi, This sounds reasonable to me overall. There are some CMake issue to go through (I need to dig into it a bit). When I run `ninja check-flang` at the moment (after fixing CMake) I end up with: Testing Time: 16.22s ******************** Failing Tests (12): Flang :: Lower/pre-fir-tree04.f90 Flang :: Semantics/allocate11.f90 Flang :: Semantics/allocate13.f90 Flang :: Semantics/c_f_pointer.f90 Flang :: Semantics/call04.f90 Flang :: Semantics/canondo16.f90 Flang :: Semantics/coarrays01.f90 Flang :: Semantics/critical02.f90 Flang :: Semantics/doconcurre...

...ssue to go > through (I need to dig into it a bit). > > > > When I run `ninja check-flang` at the moment (after fixing CMake) I end up > with: > > > > Testing Time: 16.22s > > ******************** > > Failing Tests (12): > > Flang :: Lower/pre-fir-tree04.f90 > > Flang :: Semantics/allocate11.f90 > > Flang :: Semantics/allocate13.f90 > > Flang :: Semantics/c_f_pointer.f90 > > Flang :: Semantics/call04.f90 > > Flang :: Semantics/canondo16.f90 > > Flang :: Semantics/coarrays01.f90 > >...

Hi llvm-dev We believe we have completed enough of the agreed pre-upstreaming changes to start talking about merging F18 into LLVM. The live status is tracked at [1]. There are a few details that we have not managed to hammer out and we propose to tackle inside the LLVM monorepo. I have put a summary of these at the bottom of this mail. Does anyone have any objections to flang being merged into