search for: treament

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "treament".

Did you mean: treatment
2008 Jul 06
1
What is my replication unit? Lmer for binary longitudinal data with blocks and two treaments.
...umberto PS: I would like to say that posted kind of the similar post before but addressing different questions. I deleted the previous post to avoid confusion -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-is-my-replication-unit--Lmer-for-binary-longitudinal-data-with-blocks-and-two-treaments.-tp18304494p18304494.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2016 Feb 03
4
How to deal with error messages passed as Early Media
...io message using Early Media. At the same time, I'm also trunking with Contact Center solution which doesn't support Early Media. Beside asking my ITSP to treat calls consistently or ask Contact Centerto support Early Media, is there a way to configure Asterisk to unify both above error treaments into a single one ? How can I best deal with error messages passed as Early Media. Best regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20160203/d1125c3d/attachment.html>
2008 Sep 18
5
propensity score adjustment using R
...ope. And here is where the problem starts. Most textbooks i considered proposed to estimate a simple logit model by ML Estimation. Obviously the standard approach to do it using R is glm. The zelig package provides an alternative. My logit model is as simple at its gets: Y~X, where Y is a treament vector and X is matrix of some covariates. I wonder right now if te glm respectively summary(glm(...)) puts out something comparable to ML estimates that can be used as the estimated pscores, in such a way that there is one value for every observation. Thanks for any help in advance
2003 Aug 18
1
Remarking non conformant packets as AF13 from AF11
...hen I monitor the packets using Ethereal, it can be seen that most packets are remarked 0x28 (AF11). However, non-conforming traffic is just remarked as 0x00 (BE class) which is not what I would like. I would like all non-conforming packets to be remarked 0x38 (AF13) which would afford them special treament further down my network. I have a suspiscion that it might have something to do with the fact the I am using "continue" as the action used for each of my meters, but can''t be sure. If someone could clarify this or suggest anything or offer sample scripts then I''d be mos...
2006 Jun 15
1
Repost: Estimation when interaction is present: How do I get get the parameters from nlme?
...treatment B. The interaction term is likely to be real. The treatments are on sequential steps in a pathway and treatment B may be blocking the effect of treatment A, i.e. treatment B alone has no effect because it blocks a pathway that is not active, treatment A reduces force via this pathway and treament B therefore blocks the effect of treatment A when used together. From what I understand, please correct me if I'm wrong, the parameter estimates from summary(model.nlme) are not correct for main effects if a significant interaction is present. For example in my data treatment B alone has n...
2005 Feb 01
4
Split-split plot ANOVA
Does someone out there have an example of R-code for a split-split plot ANOVA using aov or another function? The design is not balanced. I never set up one in R before and it would be nice to see an example before I tackle a very complex design I have to model. Thanks, Mike Mike Saunders Research Assistant Forest Ecosystem Research Program Department of Forest Ecosystem Sciences University of
2006 Jun 09
0
interaction terms in regression analysis
...ent B. The interaction term is likely to be real. The treatments are on sequential steps in a pathway and treatment A may be blocking the effect of treatment B, i.e. treatment A alone has no effect because it blocks a pathway that is not active, treatment B reduces force via this pathway and treament A therefore blocks the effect of treatment B when used together. So back to my question How do I extract estimates of the parameters from my model object for a specific combination of factors including the interaction term. i.e. what is the ed50 (and std err) for A-/B-, A+/B-, A-/B+, A+/B+ ?...
2005 Apr 07
0
how to analysis this kind of data set?
...m.The green channel of all the arrays are common,the untreated cell.Here follows the experiment design: a_0hr,a_3hr,a_8hr,a_12hr,a_24hr,a_48hr,a_72hr, b_3hr,b_8hr,b_12hr,b_24hr,b_48hr,b_72hr, ab_3hr,ab_8hr,ab_12hr,ab_24hr,ab_48hr,ab_72hr. A total of 19 *cDNA microarrays*.a_0hr means* *drug *a *treament *0 hours vs. control. *And a_3hrs means drug a treatment 3 hours vs. control.So for drug *b *and their combination *ab*(drug a and drug b added together).My goal is to identify the three sets of genes,the genes differentially expressed by drug a,the genes by drug b ,and their combination. i am...
2010 Nov 15
1
... predict.coxph
>If you are looking at radioactive decay maybe but how often do >you actually see exponential KM curves in real life? Exponential curves are rare. But proportional hazards does not imply exponential. > A trial design could in fact try to get all the control sample to "event" at the same time if enough was known about prognostic factors and natural trajectory You are a
2011 Sep 22
1
Wrapper of linearHypothesis (car) for post-hoc of repeated measures ANOVA
...ol")) > levelcomb <- list(treatment=c(A=1,control=-1)) > levelcomb <- list(treatment=c(-1,1,0)) Now, let's suppose that I am interested in the (marginally) significant interaction between treatment and phase. First I test the simple main effect of phase for different levels of treament (e.g. for the "control" group). To do this, levelcomb must have one variable for each interacting factor (treatment and phase): levelcomb$treatment will specify the treatment that I want to fix for the simple main effects test ("control"), and levelcomb$phase will have a NA valu...