search for: treacher

Hi everyone suppose I have a <- array(1:256,rep(4,4)) and want to access a[1,2,3,1] by the vector c(1,2,3,1). As per yesterday, I can use do.call(): a[1,2,3,1] == do.call("[",c(list(a),c(1,2,3,1))) Now how do I apply the above technique (or indeed any other technique!) to get a[1,2,3,] [1] 37 101 165 229 from a vector like c(1,2,3,0) or c(1,2,3,NULL) or c(1,2,3,NA)?

...y, weighted by their weights, xw and yw (to eventually figure out if y comes from the population x, similar to Kolmogorov-Smirnov GOF)? > qqplot(x,y) # What now? Thanks for any help, -- -- Vivek Satsangi Student, Rochester, NY USA Life is short, the art long, opportunity fleeting, experiment treacherous, judgement difficult.

...or I create a new file with "touch héhohàhù" they appear perfectly fine, with accents and all. What can be the cause of this weird encoding effect? You notice that on the new server I didn't use "iocharset=utf8" option. However the files with accented characters look fine (treacherously). Bonus question, I have 327 TB of data with mangled file names. Any trick to avoid copying everything *again* would be welcome... -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique...

Hi, I want to use a more accurate value of exp(1).  The value given by R is 2.718282. I want a value which has more than 15 decimal places. Can anyone let me know how can I increase the accuracy level. Actually there are some large multipliers of exp(1) in my whole expression, and I want a more accurate result at the last step of my program, and for that I need to use highly accurate value

Hi- I'm new to Gluster, but am trying to get it set up on a new compute cluster we're building. We picked Gluster for one of our cluster file systems (we're also using Lustre for fast scratch space), but the Gluster performance has been so bad that I think maybe we have a configuration problem -- perhaps we're missing a tuning parameter that would help, but I can't find