search for: travaglia

Hi all, Whenever I start up TC and implement traffic policing using ingress, I get logs that goes something like this: Classifier actions preferred over ingress. What does that mean?? This are the relevent lines : tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1

...else cfg.nvc0.memtype = 0xfe; height = NOUVEAU_ALIGN(height, NVC0_TILE_HEIGHT(cfg.nv50.tile_mode)); If this is intentional, please mark this bug as Invalid and sorry for disturbing. Regards, Paulo S?rgio Travaglia -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20140701/3ab5bcc7/attachment.html>

Hi all... How do i set U32 to filter a port range, instead of a single port? In normal use: source port 80 we use: "... match ip sport 80 0xffff ..." - I know that is something about the 0xffff parameter.... I need to filter ports 1 ~ 1024 to a higher priority class... i tried with IPTABLES MARK and TC FW, but it''s not working.... (...) # iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p

Im getting into tc. How can I control P2P (peer to peer) traffic??? which filters??? any ideas??? Hugonik

Dear All, Sorry to trouble again..... After go through www.lartc.org I have implemented the HTB instead of CBQ for the same scenario. Now following files are under /etc/sysconfig/htb directory. eth0 DEFAULT=30 R2Q=10 eth0-2.root RATE=256kbps BURST=25k eth0-2:10.comp1 RATE=120kbps BURST=12k PRIO=0 LEAF=sfq RULE=192.168.200.0/24 eth0-2:20.comp2