search for: trasnferdbgvalu

...its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn't find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case. I found this problem because a recently added unittest, DebugInfo/X86/linear-dbg-value.ll fails for my pr...

...node is not transferred to the new node. > > t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 à t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. > > For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? best, vedant > I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this c...

...and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? best, vedant I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case....

...node is not transferred to the new node. > > t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 à t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. > > For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. > > Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? > > best, > vedant > > > I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs...

...and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? best, vedant I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case...

...its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 --> t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn't find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case. I found this problem because a recently added unittest, DebugInfo/Generic/linear-dbg-value.ll fails for m...

...node is not transferred to the new node. > > t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 à t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. > > For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. > > Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? > > best, > vedant > > > > I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization...

...node is not transferred to the new node. > > t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 à t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. > > For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. > > Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? > > best, > vedant > > > > I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization...

...ansferred to the new node. >> >> t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 à t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. >> >> For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. >> >> Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? >> >> best, >> vedant >> >> >> >> I am wondering If I...

...sult and its dbg_value node is not transferred to the new node. t9: i32 = add nsw t5, t8 à t31: i64 = add t30, t7 ; the dbg_value node is not transferred to the new i64 add node. For expansion, DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger calls transferDbgValues() but I couldn’t find any place to call trasnferDbgValues() for integer type promotion in DAGTypeLegalizer ::SetPromotedInteger and other places. Maybe the right place to do this is within the PromoteIntRes_ helper for sign extensions? best, vedant I am wondering If I miss anything or the legalization needs to call transferDbgValues() for this case...