search for: trapni

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "trapni".

Did you mean: trapnr
2010 Oct 29
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM program compile error w/ gcc 4.5 but not 4.4
...on GCC 4.5.1 on Solaris10/x86 now, and can't just install a GCC 4.4.5 in order to *just* compile my own stuff. I cannot test GCC 3.3.5 nor clang (on the Solaris10) though, since my code requires C++0x features not available in either package. This is the error: In file included from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:17:0, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/ADT/StringMap.h:18, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/PassRegistry.h:20, from /waflhome/trapni/local/include/llvm/PassSupport.h:25, from /...
2010 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] how to call back from JITted code to some native custom functions/variables.
...: loaded via custom plugins and registered the way the API above offers us). But I need some advice in how to go further. How could I now make such "callbacks" to handler (function) calls and variable "calls" possible? Many thanks in advance, Christian Parpart. [1] github.com/trapni/flow (the *tiny* source code I'm talking about)
2011 Oct 31
1
[ruby-libvirt] who's using it
Hey all, I would like to know who / what project is using this binding. So I could learn the API a bit easier than reading through the rough rdoc-based API documentation, which is not really helpful to me, as I do not know the C API yet either. my intention is, to some day, be able to create a Rails web app for managing libvirt hosts (mainly OpenVZ/vserver/LXC and possibly QEMU). Thanks in
2004 Apr 24
9
newbie: TC[NG] with (256kbit/s down and 768kbit/s up) on a router
Hi all, this is really not really very easy to understand, or, to get in. Well, I''ve the following configuration on the router box: LAN - interface: eth0 - network: 192.168.2.5/24 - bandwidth: 100Mbit/s INET interface - interface: ppp0 - network: .dynamic.ip./0 - bandwidth: DOWN=1536kbit/s and UP=256kbit/s the LAN interface is to serve 6 other clients with internet and
2011 Nov 18
1
libvirt and linux-vserver
Hi, I was just googling around for linux-vserver support in libvirt, however, only found sad ppl complaining about the fact, that there is still no linux-vserver support in libbirt. Despite the fact, that there was some kind of lag in review by more than one person, why isn't it still in? so... merely two years after? I think once the patched would have been applied, ppl would start using it,
2012 Jan 17
1
web frontend for managing libvirt servers
Hi all, I know that redhat has some web based GUI for managing libvirt clusters, however, I am not having purchased redhat :-) Is there any good open-source web frontend you can recommend for managing your libvirt instances? Ideally with VNC/spice support for connecting to the remote? I know of proxmox, which we used so far for our openvz containers, but I am about to migrate to KVM (and
2012 Jan 23
1
oVirt setup issues
Hi all, as suggested in a prior mail, I was now trying out oVirt - however, on a non-Redhat/Debian system - and ran into huge issues primary due to the lag of information / documenation. So here my assumptions: * oVirt is a web application based on JBoss application server. * VDSM is an agent to run on every hypervisor (or also VM?) * nothing else needed? (despite jboss, java-jdk-1.6,
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
I wouldn't say that. I know quite a few systems here around that even try to avoid python where possible. but cmake however, as a build system, is welcomed by all of us (working as a sysop in a unix environment). I'd also (as a non-llvm-dev but llvm-userdev) vote for NOT reinventing the wheel but to use the tool the fits you the best, personally that's even cmake, too. it has a well
2007 Jul 09
2
custom routing (two gateways)
Hi all, i''m having a somewhat stupid problem I can''t get rid of. we''ve a server that accepts incoming world connections from a load balancer (10.10.10.4) to port 80, and we still want to serve incoming ssh/http from the firewall (10.10.10.1) routed to this host (10.10.10.90) and their reply packets of cause shall be send out through the firewall. unfortunately, both