search for: transporting

I have a distributed/replicated setup with Glusterfs 3.0.2, that I'm testing on 4 servers, each with access to /mnt/gluster (which consists of all directories /mnt/data01 - data24) on each server. I'm using configs I built from volgen, but every time I access a file (via an 'ls -l') for the first time, I get all of these messages in my logs on each server: [2010-05-04 10:50:30] W

Hi, I have a distributed volume which runs on Fedora 26 systems with glusterfs 3.11.2 from gluster.org repos: ---------- [root at taupo ~]# glusterd --version glusterfs 3.11.2 gluster> volume info gv2 Volume Name: gv2 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 6b468f43-3857-4506-917c-7eaaaef9b6ee Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 6 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

As a preparation to support multiple transports, this patch adds the 'transport' member at the 'struct vsock_sock'. This new field is initialized during the creation in the __vsock_create() function. This patch also renames the global 'transport' pointer to 'transport_single', since for now we're only supporting a single transport registered at run-time.

As a preparation to support multiple transports, this patch adds the 'transport' member at the 'struct vsock_sock'. This new field is initialized during the creation in the __vsock_create() function. This patch also renames the global 'transport' pointer to 'transport_single', since for now we're only supporting a single transport registered at run-time.

Hi, I'm still struggling with dovecot and Unixware: On my main server, I have two problems: 1- imap-login has great difficulties to connect to 'default'. I have traced it to accept in auth_master_listener.c witch fails with errno=71 (EPROTO) weird... 2- It some times works and I can log-in but imap gets killed by signal 6 (abort?) See the logs: Jan 24 12:40:25 dovecot: Dovecot

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:56 AM Thanks a lot for working on this! > With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using > also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and > host->guest transports at the same time. > > Major changes: > - vsock core module can be

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:56 AM Thanks a lot for working on this! > With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using > also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and > host->guest transports at the same time. > > Major changes: > - vsock core module can be

On 2/15/16 12:50 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > Carlos Chavez wrote: >> Is it possible to use serveral protocols for a single transport section >> in pjsip.con? In sip.conf you could use transport=udp,ws,wss so you >> cound use webrtc along with your phones but if I try: >> >> [transport-udp] >> type=transport >> protocol=udp,ws,wss >> bind=0.0.0.0 >

I've run into a problem with Gluster stability with the RDMA transport. Below is a description of the environment, a simple script that can replicate the problem, and log files from my test system. I can work around the problem by using the TCP transport over IPoIB but would like some input onto what may be making the RDMA transport fail in this case. ===== Symptoms ===== - Error from test

the glusterfs 3.0.X crashed on Fedora 12, it got buffer overflow, seems fine on Fedora 11 Name : fuse Arch : x86_64 Version : 2.8.1 Release : 4.fc12 Name : glibc Arch : x86_64 Version : 2.11.1 Release : 1 complete log: ====================================================================================================== [root at test_machine06 ~]# glusterfsd

Hello, I have what I think is a fairly basic Gluster setup, however when I try to carry out a replace-brick operation it consistently fails... Here are the command line options: root at osh1:~# gluster volume info media Volume Name: media Type: Replicate Volume ID: 4c290928-ba1c-4a45-ac05-85365b4ea63a Status: Started Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 06:58:24PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:53:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:24:44PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote: >> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:53:15AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> > > >

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 6:18 PM > To: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/14] vsock: add multi-transports support > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:53:39PM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > > >

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 6:18 PM > To: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/14] vsock: add multi-transports support > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 01:53:39PM +0000, Jorgen Hansen wrote: > > > From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > > >

This patch adds the support of multiple transports in the VSOCK core. With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Major changes: - vsock core module can be loaded interdependently of the transports - each 'struct virtio_transport' has a new feature fields

Is it possible to use serveral protocols for a single transport section in pjsip.con? In sip.conf you could use transport=udp,ws,wss so you cound use webrtc along with your phones but if I try: [transport-udp] type=transport protocol=udp,ws,wss bind=0.0.0.0 I get an error that transport-udp is not found. Do I need a dedicated interface for WebRTC? [Feb 15 12:42:10] ERROR[3308]:

This patch adds the support of multiple transports in the VSOCK core. With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Major changes: - vsock core module can be loaded regardless of the transports - vsock_core_init() and vsock_core_exit() are renamed to

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, Asterisk is great but I'm having issues with setting up realtime for our call center, which is needed for login integration with the rest of our applications (telephonists' web interface, etc.). I have reviewed a large number of previous posts to the mailing list and the voip-info wiki to no avail. Setup is as follows: Linux 2.6.23 (gentoo) / AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ /