search for: transobject

One particular use of Puppet would be to serve as a machine fact/configuration retrieval tool. So in order to produce a list of packages with version-release info installed on each machine something along the lines of the following code could be run: require ''puppet'' Puppet::Type.type(:package).defaultprovider.list.each do |package| puts

...collectable: false name: "/tmp/rhel4base_test_junkapp_test_rollup.pp.test" name: junkapp_test_application_rollup_classfile - !ruby/object:Puppet::TransBucket type: websphere_6_1_dmgr children: - !ruby/object:Puppet::TransObject file: "/opt/puppet/config/modules/ws61/manifests/definitions/websphere_6.1_dmgr.pp" params: '' Before anyone asks, I created the first error above with a template that looks like this: <%= appContext %> 12345678901234567890123456789012...

I''d like to keep the desired and current states of a machine regarding it''s configuration. Sometimes a chain of administrative commands is needed to get a special thing (re)configured on a machine, e.g. reconfig of a suncluster. This cannot be done with puppet in an easy way. In the majority of cases, these commands change appropriate files, which reflect the current

Hi all, I''m Benjamin Sonntag, I''m one of the AlternC project developpers. AlternC is an opensource mass-hosting control panel software suite based on debian. We are working on a new version of this control panel, and we want to make the less and the best work we can for this version. So, as usual, we are using as much free software as we can, and we started to use puppet for

Is there an easy way to list which puppet daemons a puppetmaster controls? ... and from that, is there a way of getting the puppetmaster to store a copy of their compiled configuration somewhere? Thanks, mike

For those of you out there using export/collect (which we really need to come up with a better name for...), can you test the current SVN code? I''m mostly wondering if the performance is any better. To use it, you''ll have to remove your current database, since the database schema is significantly changed. I''m getting what looks like an additional 25% reduction