search for: transmitted

#0 io_remove (io=0x0) at ioloop.c:51 51 if ((io->condition & IO_NOTIFY_MASK) != 0) { (gdb) bt #0 io_remove (io=0x0) at ioloop.c:51 #1 0x0804fd68 in auth_client_connection_destroy_wait (conn=0x80877d8) at auth-client-connection.c:494 #2 0x08050acd in auth_callback (request=0x84716b8, result=134681554, reply=0x0, reply_size=0) at auth-client-connection.c:104 #3 0x08050950 in

I have a software-only PBX set up. I can register various softphones and they will call each other -- but I've never succeeded in getting any voice routed from any of the softphones. Only the console will transmit audio. I am writing to ask if I have missed some obvious step in configuring the system. Conditions: (1) Softphones running on the same machine as the PBX: Only Kphone seems

Hy Guys, My samba version: 4.0.13 ntp version: 4.2.6p3 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS I have a weird problem, I sat up the time service via https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_NTP On the servers I have no firewall. This port is open when i check with nmap, ntp runs. Looks like all of my Windows 7 clients works fine but w32tm /resync says Permission denied 0x8007005, so not that good :) Windows

...gl glx_version is 1.4 and GLX_SGIX_fbconfig extension is unsupp orted. Expect problems. Got Request for zip://C:\Program Files\Real\RealPlayer\normal.vs?file=datacachel ayout.xmb Trying to open C:\Program Files\Real\RealPlayer\normal.vs Trying to open datacachelayout.xmbSUCCESS datacachelayout.xmb transmitted in whole datacachelayout.xmb transmitted in whole Got Request for zip://C:\Program Files\Real\RealPlayer\normal.vs?file= normal.xmb Trying to open C:\Program Files\Real\RealPlayer\normal.vs Trying to open normal.xmbSUCCESS normal.xmb transmitted in whole normal.xmb transmitted in whole Got Request...

Hi all, i have a little problem to understand this warning message, it's annoying and it cause a lot of spurious in the log files. Im working with this scenario: a sip outgoing trunk (Trunk-out) that support only ulaw and all calls are always routed to this. a list of sip UAs that potentially can use any codec apart g729/g723. I setup the asterisk to do as mediaproxy so directmedia=no and

Hello! Client is using ulaw, however server sometimes fills the log with following: [2011-03-09 21:23:07] WARNING[27204] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4 (ulaw)/0x8 (alaw) [2011-03-09 21:23:07] WARNING[27204] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4 (ulaw)/0x8 (alaw)

Hi, I am transmitting audio over the network by creating an RTP session for each media track. I am using the GSM media format. I'm still having a delay in the transmit if the receivers end is a slow network. Hence i am looking forward to use speex codec to compress the audio further before transmitting. Is there is any one who as implemented it? If so, please send me an example code so

Suppose we have about 1000 files at location 'A' & 500 files at location 'B' & we want them to be transmitted to each other (not exactly synchronizing two location). RSYNC can do that, no issues on that. But i have few queries further. My first query: 1. Can we make some sort of queuing procedure alongwith or through RSYNC. Like in which we can provide priorities to particular JOBs in a queue. Even...

Hi all, I did not get this error in Asterisk 1.2.5 release. I am testing on Asterisk SVN-trunk-r15187 to avail the PARKEDAT variable. - I park the call using ParkAndAnnounce - plays moh. - accept the call using ParkedCall The following errors are coming on the console and there is oneway audio - no audio after Music-On-Hold at caller's side. Please advice. I am testing using cisco 7902

At Jason's request, I am trying to help finalize the spec for the new multiqueue feature. Changes from Jason's rfc: - reserved vq 3: this makes all rx vqs even and tx vqs odd, which looks nicer to me. - documented packet steering, added a generalized steering programming command. Current modes are single queue and host driven multiqueue, but I envision support for guest driven

At Jason's request, I am trying to help finalize the spec for the new multiqueue feature. Changes from Jason's rfc: - reserved vq 3: this makes all rx vqs even and tx vqs odd, which looks nicer to me. - documented packet steering, added a generalized steering programming command. Current modes are single queue and host driven multiqueue, but I envision support for guest driven

Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a +new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number +of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to +program packet steering. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Changes from v3: Address Sasha's comments - drop

Add multiqueue support to virtio network device. Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_MULTIQUEUE for this feature, a +new configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number +of virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_STEERING to +program packet steering. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Changes from v3: Address Sasha's comments - drop

...always copied completely. The problem seems to be related to the new (in 2.5.3) option -no-whole-file. The global variable whole_file is initialized to -1 in options.c. In server_options() (options.c) it is set to zero if the original value has not been changed. A value of zero on whole_file is not transmitted to the remote rsync however. So the remote rsync has -1 instead of zero on its whole_file variable. To fix the problem I applied the following patch that forwards --no-whole-file to the remote side if whole_file has a value of zero: --- options.c.O Fri Mar 15 10:25:42 2002 +++ options.c Fri Mar 15...

Under 1.4.35 I get this message printed MANY times [May 3 21:41:21] WARNING[21567] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type 4, while native formats is 0x1000 (g722)(4096) read/write = 0x1000 (g722)(4096)/0x1000 (g722)(4096) [May 3 21:41:21] WARNING[21567] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type 4, while native formats is 0x1000 (g722)(4096) read/write = 0x1000 (g722)(4096)/0x1000

On 02/13/2018 at 08:41 AM Floimair Florian wrote: > No you're reading it wrong. > > There are 188K received with no loss, and 16441K transmitted. This doesn't make any sense to me, either. There can't be more packages transmitted than received. It's the same codec in and out and it's been running exactly the same time. > ...........Receive......... .........Transmit.......... > Count Lost Pct Jitter Count Lo...

We are getting the following on 1.8.3 and 1.8.4-rc2, HELP! Why is Asterisk unable to transcode to/from ulaw and g722? [2011-04-21 09:51:34] WARNING[22067]: chan_sip.c:6064 sip_write: Asked to transmit frame type ulaw, while native formats is 0x1000 (g722) read/write = 0x1000 (g722)/0x1000 (g722) [2011-04-21 09:51:34] WARNING[22067]: chan_sip.c:6064 sip_write: Asked to transmit frame type ulaw,

The following is mainly a capture of parts of multiple off-line discussions within members of the Crossbow team (Gopi, Thiru, Roamer, May-Lin, Thirumailai, Nitin, KB, ...), I thought I''d open it up to other participants. Crossbow''s core scheduling involves switching a NIC (or individual Rx rings on the NIC) to polling mode. The receive interrupt will become not only rarer,

Thanks Louis. Results below. > Hai, > > I've reading this thread more closely. > > I suggest you try the followoing. > > Check the servers hardware clock in the bios first. > Set these within 5 min, if they are not about the same. > There no RTC in the pi; the other DC is running in a VM with RTC set to UTC. I have disabled the guest from getting the time

I am transmitting many small files from Windows 2000 to Samba as AD-Member Server with a Gigabit LAN Adapter. Transmitting a large number of small files brings performance down below 80 Kbyte/s. How can I work around this? How can I identify what makes Samba so slow (and set-up Samba parameters better if it is a configuration issue?) Has there been some performance boost in some later release