search for: transitori

Hello, running unhide ( unhide-20130526-1.el7.x86_64 ) on CentOS 7 i get sometimes messages like: Found HIDDEN PID: 30784 Cmdline: "<none>" Executable: "<no link>" "<none> ... maybe a transitory process" On a second unhide run immediately after it, the process seems to have vanished. Also, i do not see anything about it in /proc, and rkhunter

14 KB/s now. Yesterday 40 KB/s. Is that transitory or there is no enough bandwidth on llvm.org?

Hi all, I have a newbie question: If I have a function with the following documentation: ca.jo(x, type = c("eigen", "trace"), ecdet = c("none", "const", "trend"), K = 2, spec=c("longrun", "transitory"), season = NULL, dumvar = NULL) Let's take "type" as an example... if I omit this parameter when calling the

After searching multiple combinations of keywords over the past two days and downloading n R graphics tutorials, I have not been able to find anything online or in my R books about how to save multiple plot panes to PNG. Specifically, I am using the irf() function in the vars package to generate plots of Impulse Response Functions: > x.data <-

Hi Oscar, > 14 KB/s now. Yesterday 40 KB/s. > Is that transitory or there is no enough bandwidth on llvm.org? Something is wrong on your side: $ git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git Cloning into llvm... remote: Counting objects: 607409, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (118270/118270), done. Receiving objects: 2% (13924/607409), 3.87 MiB | 402 KiB/s -- With best regards, Anton

Hi, I am trying to estimate a VECM without constant using the following code: data(finland) sjf <- finland sjf.reg<-ca.jo(sjf, type = c("eigen"), ecdet = c("none"), K = 2,spec=c("transitory"), season = NULL, dumvar = NULL) cajools(sjf.reg) While the cointegration test does not use a constant, it is used in the cajools which I do not want. I am sure I am

Dear All, My question is: how can I estimate VECM system with "unrestricted trend" (aka "case 5") option as a deterministic term? As far as I know, ca.jo in urca package allows for "restricted trend" only [vecm <- ca.jo(data, type = "trace"/"eigen", ecdet = "trend", K = n, spec = "transitory"/"longrun")].

ngoonee wrote: > > vitamin wrote: > > > > ngoonee wrote: > > > Well, why does my WM know about other wine apps but not e-sword? > > > > Popup, tooltip, and like windows (most windows without caption) are created as unmanaged. It all depends on what kind of windows program is using. > > > I don't think e-sword is an unmanaged window. It has a

Hello Anton and Takumi. Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> writes: >> 14 KB/s now. Yesterday 40 KB/s. >> Is that transitory or there is no enough bandwidth on llvm.org? > Something is wrong on your side: > > $ git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git > Cloning into llvm... > remote: Counting objects: 607409, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100%

Full_Name: Ross Boylan Version: N/A OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (198.144.201.14) 1. http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html includes "Paul Johnson's R tips page is a organized collection of how to do things in R, with many questions and tips culled from R-help" "R tips" is a link to http://www.ku.edu/~pauljohn/R/Rtips.html. I get a message the page is no longer

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: vramaiah at neo.tamu.edu To: "bernhard pfaff" <bernhard.pfaff at pfaffikus.de> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:03:11 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Use of R for VECM Hello Fellow R'ers I am a new user of R and I am applying it for solving Bi-Variate (Consumption and Output) VECM with Co-Integration (I(1)) with three lags on

> On 6/25/19 7:22 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: > > I foresee problems with this on both Windows and non-Windows. A > > typical libc implementation has a lot of internal state that is shared > > across API boundaries in a way that is considered an implementation > > detail. So making assumptions about which state is shared and which > > isn't is

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Hello Anton and Takumi. > > Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> writes: > > >> 14 KB/s now. Yesterday 40 KB/s. > >> Is that transitory or there is no enough bandwidth on llvm.org? > > Something is wrong on your side: > > > > $ git clone

Hi I would like to add some documentation to the xensource wiki. In particular I would like to add some notes on setting up firewalling on a Xen machine using a SuSE 9.3 dom0. (this is the Distribution I am familiar with) I can''t see an appropriate place linked off the front page to add this stuff. Also I can''t edit the front page itself to add a new catagory because it is

Hi All, please, what is causing this error.? Cheers. Mark Sargent. Setting up Install Process Setting up Repos addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 dag 100% |=========================| 0 B 00:00 //var/cache/yum/dag/repomd.xml:1: parser error : Document is empty ^ //var/cache/yum/dag/repomd.xml:1: parser error : Start tag

Why there is no pv-grub in debian packages? Pygrub exposes dom0.

I've been using pytyle, but it seems this condition is common to most tiling wms. Basically, some wine apps get handled (opensong and 'i wanna be the guy' are the ones that do on my system), but some don't, e-sword being one that doesn't. pytyle does automatic tiling, fitting the windows in a defined pattern on the screen. It just does not see e-sword, somehow, but has no

James McKenzie wrote: > On 1/30/11 8:43 PM, ngoonee wrote: > > > ngoonee wrote: > > > > > vitamin wrote: > > > > > > > ngoonee wrote: > > > > > > > > > Well, why does my WM know about other wine apps but not e-sword? > > > > > > > > > Popup, tooltip, and like windows (most windows without

I sent this to the NUT users list and no response so I thought I'd send it here next.. It's a pretty easy issue really: > Hey all, > > I have a measure-UPS card and the external cabled module. > > They're supposed to operate the same... does NUT auto detect them when using the apcsmart driver or are there config parms required? > > The the smart-slot unit is

My Linux system is acting as a NAT''ing firewall, and I have some rules for doing port forwarding/translation. I was thinking about this the other day and I realized that there are other parts of the system that consume ports. Specifically, NAT and ephemeral port allocation. It occurs to me that I could potentially have a conflict. If I set up a rule to forward/translate a port, and