Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5822 matches for "transitive".
2009 Nov 12
1
XML: Reading transition matrices into R
Hello,
from a software I have the following output in xml (see below):
It is a series of matrices, for each age one. I have 3 categories
(might vary in the application), hence, 3x3 matrices where each
element gives the probability of transition from i to j. I would like
read this data into R (preferably in a list, where each list element
is one of the age specific matrices) and - after altering
2009 Sep 21
2
Four concurrent Markov chains
Hi,
I am trying to write a simulation of the movements of four animals between
six patches. The movement between patches is based on a first-order Markov
chain so that the next patch they visit depends on the patch they were in
before.
I have written code that allows me to simulate the movement of one animal
but when I add more there seems to be a problem and all chains come back as
N/A. I can
2012 Aug 25
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Hi Anshu,
Thanks again for your feedbacks.
On 24/08/2012 17:01, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
>> I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I
>> updated the patch. It should be ok now.
>> Thanks Anshu!
>>
>> I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the
>> generation time became painfully long. In
2019 Sep 11
1
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] tests: Convert some tests to use nbdsh instead of qemu-io.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:48:28AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 9/11/19 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
> > qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
> >
> > You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has some
> > duplicated code which looks as if it ought to be
2012 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Ivan,
Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the
removal of the Transition class:
> (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure
in State (input, state) to replace them?
Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in
State instead of TransitionSet.
Thanks
-Anshu
On 8/25/2012 6:42 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote:
> Hi
2019 Sep 11
4
[PATCH nbdkit] tests: Convert some tests to use nbdsh instead of qemu-io.
Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has some
duplicated code which looks as if it ought to be refactored into a
Python function. When I tried to do that, I got loads of strange
Python problems which may indicate bugs in nbdsh itself or problems
with my
2012 Aug 29
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
On 28/08/2012 00:21, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the
> removal of the Transition class:
>
> > (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure
> in State (input, state) to replace them?
>
> Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in
> State
2011 Apr 19
2
Markov transition matrices , missing transitions for certain years
Hi all,
I am working for nest box occupancy data for birds and would like to
construct a Markov transition matrix, to derive transition probabilities for
ALL years of the study (not separate sets of transition probabilities for
each time step). The actual dataset I'm working with is 125 boxes over 14
years that can be occupied by 7 different species, though I have provided a
slimmed down
2012 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I updated
the patch. It should be ok now.
Ivan
On 27/06/2012 21:42, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote:
> Committed in r159281.
>
> -Anshu
>
>
> On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote:
>> Hi Anshu,
>>
>> I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just
>> checked it.
2012 Jun 27
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Committed in r159281.
-Anshu
On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote:
> Hi Anshu,
>
> I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just
> checked it. Could you please commit it?
>
> Ivan
>
> On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote:
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The
2001 Jul 09
3
transitions in R
Hi, All. I'd have a set of data in an array:
process <- c( 5 , 7 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 4 , 4 , 1 , 5 , 4 , ...)
and I'd like to know the number of transitions in this data. I
calculate transitions as the number of times a number follows another
number. thus, something like this would be a 1 deep transition:
1 --> 1 : 10% (and actual number of 1 --> 1 occurrences)
1
2015 Oct 15
2
Operand bundles and gc transition arguments
As part of adding `"deopt"` operand bundles, we're aiming to change
RewriteStatepointsForGC (called RS4GC henceforth) from rewriting
existing `gc.statepoint` calls to transforming normal LLVM calls and
invokes into `gc.statepoint` calls and invokes (i.e. to do
PlaceSafepoints + RS4GC in one step). This will make `gc.statepoint`
an artifact of the gc lowering strategy that only
2011 Oct 20
1
Constructing the transition pair using loop function and paste()
Hi all,
I'd like to thank those who helped me with my previous loop function
question with agents/events. I have solved the problem with the advice from
this community.
I have now moved on to the next step, which requires me to find all the
transition pair within an event. A sample data and the R commands I've
written are as follow:
x <-
2012 Jun 26
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Hi Anshu,
I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just
checked it. Could you please commit it?
Ivan
On 26/06/2012 04:44, adasgupt at codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The patch looks
> good to me. Please check that it applies on trunk and go ahead and commit.
>
> Thanks
> -Anshu
2016 Jan 15
5
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release()
> and smp_read_acquire(),
But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all
the confusion lays.
smp_mb() is strongly/globally transitive, all CPUs will agree on the order.
Whereas the RCpc release+acquire is weakly so, only the two cpus
involved in the handover will agree on the order.
2016 Jan 15
5
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release()
> and smp_read_acquire(),
But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all
the confusion lays.
smp_mb() is strongly/globally transitive, all CPUs will agree on the order.
Whereas the RCpc release+acquire is weakly so, only the two cpus
involved in the handover will agree on the order.
2012 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Hi Ivan,
> I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I
> updated the patch. It should be ok now.
> Thanks Anshu!
>
> I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the
> generation time became painfully long. In fact, the main problem was
> in writeTableAndAPI(). I propose another patch to fix it:
> - Fixed memory leaks.
> -
2017 Aug 28
5
"Improvement with the R code"
Hello,
I am trying to implement a formula
aij= transition from state S_i to S_j/no of transition at state S_i
Code I have written is working with three state {1,2,3 }, but if the number
of states become={1,2,3,4,......n} then the code will not work, so can some
help me with this.
For and some rows of my data frame look like
2009 May 07
2
for loop vectorization
Hi, I am still not familiar with vectorization.
Could you help with making this for loop more efficient?
The code is trying to make a Q matrix for a multidimensional state space
with specific conditions.
thanks
Mira
tmp = 0:(maxvals[1])
for(i in 2:nchars) {
tmp <- outer(tmp, 0:(maxvals[i]), FUN="paste", sep=".")
}
states = tmp
stateidx = array(1:length(states),
2017 Aug 28
0
"Improvement with the R code"
Hi,
I think you overthought this one a little bit, I don't know if this is the
kind of code you are expecting but I came up with something like that:
generate_transition_matrix <- function(data, n_states) {
#To be sure I imagine you should check n_states is right at this point
transitions <- matrix(0, n_states, n_states)
#we could improve a little bit here because at