search for: transitionary

The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. -Chris > On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com <mailto:mbraun at apple.com...

...to move all the Statistic variable into classes somewhere, pass around way more contexts). I am NOT volunteering for that part of work. - Matthias > On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: > > The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. > > -Chris > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:28 PM...

...ss around way more contexts). I am NOT volunteering for that part of work. > > - Matthias > >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. >> >> -Chris >> >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>...

...xts). I am NOT volunteering for that part of work. >> >> - Matthias >> >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>&g...

...k. >>>> >>>> - Matthias >>>> >>>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. >>>>> >>>>> -Chris >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote:...

...ing for that part of work. >>> >>> - Matthias >>> >>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. >>>> >>>> -Chris >>>> >>>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: >>>>...

...;> - Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com <mailto:beanz at apple.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The intention with cl::opt was to use the singleton as a transitionary measure only. The end goal was to move option storage into the {MC|LLVM}Context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Chris >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.am...

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com <mailto:mbraun at apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: >>>

OK, I have some basic functionality to support bind variables, it appears to work with the ''old'' %s style too. I''ve altered sanitize_conditions in activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb to check whether bind variables are in the statement (/\?/). If they are, replace all the ?s to escaped values from the arguments array. else santize and expand. There are a few

...rong. > > Bob already mentioned in the other thread that `-fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping` was sufficiently different from `-fprofile-instr-generate` that `-fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping` was not an acceptable workaround that could be used for enabling FEPGO during a transitionary period, so I'm not convinced that your argument here makes sense. I’m not sure what you’re referring to here, and I have a hard time parsing the sentence. I suppose “was not an acceptable” should read “was an acceptable”? I would be surprised that Bob ever agreed to completely transition away...

...thread that `-fprofile-instr-generate >>> -fcoverage-mapping` was sufficiently different from >>> `-fprofile-instr-generate` that `-fprofile-instr-generate >>> -fcoverage-mapping` was not an acceptable workaround that could be used for >>> enabling FEPGO during a transitionary period, so I'm not convinced that >>> your argument here makes sense. >>> >>> >>> I’m not sure what you’re referring to here, and I have a hard time >>> parsing the sentence. I suppose “was not an acceptable” should read “was an >>> acceptab...

...`-fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping` was sufficiently different >>>>> from `-fprofile-instr-generate` that `-fprofile-instr-generate >>>>> -fcoverage-mapping` was not an acceptable workaround that could be used for >>>>> enabling FEPGO during a transitionary period, so I'm not convinced that >>>>> your argument here makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I’m not sure what you’re referring to here, and I have a hard time >>>>> parsing the sentence. I suppose “was not an acceptable” s...

...t;> >> Bob already mentioned in the other thread that `-fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping` was sufficiently different from `-fprofile-instr-generate` that `-fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping` was not an acceptable workaround that could be used for enabling FEPGO during a transitionary period, so I'm not convinced that your argument here makes sense. > > I’m not sure what you’re referring to here, and I have a hard time parsing the sentence. I suppose “was not an acceptable” should read “was an acceptable”? I would be surprised that Bob ever agreed to completely transi...

> On May 24, 2016, at 5:21 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com <mailto:vsk at apple.com>> wrote: > > > On May 23, 2016, at 8:56 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com <mailto:davidxl at google.com>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at

...>>> `-fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping` was sufficiently different >>>> from `-fprofile-instr-generate` that `-fprofile-instr-generate >>>> -fcoverage-mapping` was not an acceptable workaround that could be used for >>>> enabling FEPGO during a transitionary period, so I'm not convinced that >>>> your argument here makes sense. >>>> >>>> >>>> I’m not sure what you’re referring to here, and I have a hard time >>>> parsing the sentence. I suppose “was not an acceptable” should read “was an &...

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > > On May 23, 2016, at 8:56 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Jake and I have been integrating IRPGO on PS4, and we've identified 3 > remaining work