search for: transfroms

Hi, I have a data set (weight) that does not follow the Gaussian (Normal) distribution. However, I have to transform the data before applying the Gaussian distribution. I used this syntax and used log(weight) as: posJy.model<-glm(log(weight) ~ factor(pos), family=gaussian(link='identity'), subset=Soil=="Jy"). This syntax COULD NOT transform the data. But if I transform the

Hi, is there a exstisting function (..i found nothing until now.) what makes it possible transfrom a dataset: ID AGE V.MAI V.JUNE 11 20 100 120 12 30 200 90 into ID AGE V 11 20 100 11 20 120 12 30 200 12 30 90 ,or have i to programm ths my self? Thanks for any comment, help and/or starting point. regards,christian

...--enable-optimized configure option is used to specify a Release build. - make check-all — This run the regression tests to ensure everything is in working order. I indeed am confused with this compiling method. For example , there are two files : CMakeLists.txt and Makefile in llvm/lib/Transfroms/Hello. I want to add my testing Pass in lib for testing. I should prepare two files according to the way you compile.( Makefile : autotools , CMakeLists.txt : cmake) Please correct me if what I say are wrong. - mudongliang Please someone correct me if I am wrong but the autotools build will b...

I want to transform the data by "tapply" to one dataframe. But I can not get it. For example: > tst=tapply(point,pp,length) > tst[1:10] p1 p10 p100 p1000 p1001 p1002 p1003 p1004 p1005 p1006 1 5 1 8 6 5 8 7 4 4 > res=as.data.frame(tst) # I try to transform it > res[1:10,] p1 p10 p100 p1000 p1001 p1002 p1003 p1004 p1005 p1006 1 5 1 8 6 5

Hi, all, I used lxc-tools to create a linux container. I am trying to transfrom LXC container configuration into a domain XML fragment using the following command: *$ virsh -c lxc:/// domxml-from-native lxc /var/lib/lxc/my_conatiner/config* However, I get the error message, error: this function is not supported by the connection driver: virConnectDomainXMLFromNative It seems that

Hi, i would like transfrom characters from a data.frame to factors automatic. > tofac <- function(df){ + i=0 + repeat{ + i <- i+1 + if(!is.character(df[,i])) + next + df[,i] <- as.factor(df[,i]) + print(i) + if(i == length(df)) + break } + } > > tofac(abrdat) [1] 7 [1] 8 [1] 9 [1] 11 [1] 13 [1] 15 Error in "[.data.frame"(df, , i) : undefined columns selected This

According to http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html#metadata_block_streaminfo : "FLAC supports from 4 to 32 bits per sample. Currently the reference encoder and decoders only support up to 24 bits per sample. " This is why I'm confused. I though one of the benefits of FLAC was it's ability to encode in word lengths longer than 16 bits. MW -----Original Message----- From:

Hi, from what you're writing: "The logaritmic transformation "shapiro.test(log10(y))" says: W=0.9773, p-value= 2.512e-05." it seems the log-values are not distributed normally and so original data are not distributed like a log-normal: the p-value is extremally small! Other tests for normality are available in package: nortest compare the log-transformation of your ecdf

Hi ether, On 12/26/09 13:06, ether zhhb wrote: > hi, > > dose anyone going/planning to add something like > Graphite(http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite) in gcc to llvm(or that > should be implement at the level of clang?)? I already looked into implementing something like Graphite for LLVM. However just recently, so I have not released any code yet. As soon as some code is

Dear colleagues, Is there any way of saving an animated plot with R? For instance, any format that could be read by Microsoft windows media or whatever. Cheers, Jesus

Vikram, I also agree with you. I understand that target-independent representation is very valuable and important for software compilation. However, when we are doing high-level synthesis (also called behavioral/architectural synthesis), the targeting architecture is also changing. That is, we need to do architecture exploration and the IR transfromation simultaneously. For example,

The current code only works iff the tsize option is set. This patch fixes the handling of the OACK packet and makes the code work with all combinations of the tsize and blksize options. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt at gmx.de> diff --git a/core/pxe.c b/core/pxe.c index 81d3e23..a4b8a14 100644 --- a/core/pxe.c +++ b/core/pxe.c @@ -913,8 +913,10 @@ static void pxe_searchdir(char

Why are there two ways to compile LLVM? make and cmake! What's the difference of those two ways? - mudongliang

hi Tobi , that sounds greate :D On 2009-12-27 5:43, Tobias Grosser wrote: > I already looked into implementing something like Graphite for LLVM. > However just recently, so I have not released any code yet. As soon as > some code is available I will post patches. whats its status? do you need any help? > A general plan to implement polyhedral transformations in LLVM: > > 1.

Hello all, Would somebody be kind enough to show me how to do a KS test in R for a lognormal distribution with ESTIMATED parameters. The R function ks.test()says "the parameters specified must be prespecified and not estimated from the data" Is there a way to correct this when one uses estimated data? Regards, Kwabena. -------------------------------------------- Kwabena Adusei-Poku

Yiping, If you are doing architectural synthesis, I do agree that you likely need to capture some operations in the instruction set, especially if you want to perform analyses and optimizations on those operations. Some specific comments: On Oct 20, 2004, at 6:04 PM, Yiping Fan wrote: > Vikram, >     I also agree with you. I understand that target-independent > representation is

Yiping, Could you describe in a little more detail what your goals are? I agree with Reid and Misha that modifying the instruction definition is usually not advisable but to suggest alternatives, we would need to know more. Also, for some projects it could make sense to change the instruction set. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Oct 20, 2004, at 2:41 PM,

On 12/27/09 10:18, ether wrote: > hi Tobi , > > that sounds greate :D > > On 2009-12-27 5:43, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> I already looked into implementing something like Graphite for LLVM. >> However just recently, so I have not released any code yet. As soon as >> some code is available I will post patches. > whats its status? do you need any help? Very

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:59:45AM -0700, Yiping Fan wrote: > Yeah. We need to have more extra fields in the instruction. Fo > example, during high-level synthesis, we must schedule an instruction > to a certain control step (or cycle), and bind it to be execute on a > certain functional unit, etc. Since we're talking about "execution" and "scheduling", you

Hello R users, For the last few days I am struggling with the following task: my data.frame: A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 58.81 53.292 54.501 13.013 17.39 19.407 56.02 56.251 54.033 20.099 13.15 10.411 55.376 53.099 57.625 13.396 21.031 13.22 58.584 53.194 54.218 13.038 16.854 19.289 55.7 55.921 53.847 19.942 13.153 9.828 55.093 52.934