Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "transformpip".
Did you mean:
transformpipe
2019 Oct 06
1
should base R have a piping operator ?
...age space
> and has the potential to mitigate some pretty serious downsides to the
> pipes relating to debugging, which would be to implement them in the parser.
Actually, that could be done in package space too: just write a
function to do the transformation. That is, something like
transformPipe( a %>% b %>% c )
could convert the original expression into one like yours below. This
could be done by a smart IDE like RStudio without the user typing anything.
A really strong argument for doing this in a package instead of Bison/C
code in the parser is the help page ?magrittr::"...
2019 Oct 05
5
should base R have a piping operator ?
Yes but this exageration precisely misses the point.
Concerning your examples:
* I love fread but I think it makes a lot of subjective choices that are
best associated with a package. I think it
changed a lot with time and can still change, and we have great developers
willing to maintain it and be reactive
regarding feature requests or bug reports
*.group_by() adds a class that works only (or