search for: transferring_and_seizing_fsmo_rol

Hi! In wiki -> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles#Difference_of_Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles "If the DC is broken (e. g. hardware defect) and will never come back again, then you can seize the role on a remaining DC. It is very important that the old DC will never be connected to the network again, if it is connected again, this...

...as the old DC1 has been removed. However - this is where I am having problems. I can't seem to sieze the roles onto DC2 (which has been running for years and should still be fine...) Am I getting the syntax wrong? I have been following the guide on the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles#Seizing_a_FSMO_Role however when I run the following command, this is what happens: dc2:~ $ sudo samba-tool fsmo sieze --role=rid Usage: samba-tool fsmo <subcommand> samba-tool fsmo: error: no such option: --role I'm running samba 4.9, in case that makes a difference. dc2:~ $ smbd -V...

Hi everyone, I have a customer we would like to switch to Samba. Because of a heavy amount of customization on each workstations, I would avoid removing workstations from the domain. I had the idea I could add Samba as a Secondary domain controller and simulate a failure on the PDC but a complete migration guide or a quick guide could be appreciate. Any suggestion ? Anyone did it before ?​

Buen día Agradeciendo de antemano a mi consulta Cual es el procedimiento correcto o que pasos debo de seguir para realizar un respaldode Usuarios,Grupos,Computadores  y Politicas alojadas en un Servidor Samba 4 que actua como PDC - AD, a otro recién instaldo Samba 4.6.1 -> 4.6.5 (over  Ubuntu Server 16.04 x86_64) Gracias Good day Thanking you in advance for my inquiry What is the correct

But, if you use the "seizi" dc that no longer has the FSMO should be removed from the network, right? Regards; On 06-06-2018 11:36, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:24:33 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> The problem with this is that both Dcs will continue on the >> network ... I

On 14/04/2023 14:20, Luis Peromarta via samba wrote: > Apologies. Now I get it. Only one SRV record for the PCD emulator. I will delete the other 2. Yes, one PDC_Emulator, one dns record. > > If I transfer the FSMO role will that be updated then ? On a samba AD DC, the samba_dnsupdate script is run at start up and then every 10 minutes, this script uses a file called dns_update_list

...back? If I understood how it would be .... Regards; On 06-06-2018 15:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:35:29 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> In wiki -> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles#Difference_of_Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles >> >> "If the DC is broken (e. g. hardware defect) and will never come back >> again, then you can seize the role on a remaining DC. It is very >> important that the old DC will never be connected to the network >&g...

...of a sole DC.  So, we now have two domain controllers, the original being ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.17), and the new one being DOMAIN-ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.11).  I want the new DC to become the FSMO role owner, so I followed the instructions here - https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles. The first five FSMO roles transferred successfully, but the domaindns and forestdns both failed to transfer: root at DOMAIN-ad:/var/lib/samba/sysvol# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all FSMO transfer of 'rid' role successful FSMO transfer of 'pdc' role successful FSMO transfer...

..., we now have two domain controllers, the original being > ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.17), and the new one being > DOMAIN-ad.DOMAIN.intranet (192.168.0.11).  I want the new DC to > become the FSMO role owner, so I followed the instructions here - > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Transferring_and_Seizing_FSMO_Roles. > The first five FSMO roles transferred successfully, but the domaindns > and forestdns both failed to transfer: > > root at DOMAIN-ad:/var/lib/samba/sysvol# samba-tool fsmo transfer > --role=all FSMO transfer of 'rid' role successful > FSMO transfer of 'pdc'...

Hi all, again, I ask for your help. I have a domain with 2DC's running samba 4.10.6. The disk on the DC holding the FSMO's failed. I recovered most of it from backups, and reinstalled samba hopping to rejoin it to the domain. However, when I try # kinit administrator #samba-tool domain join eurohidra.local DC -Uadministrator I get #Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed

On 29/01/2023 18:58, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > I am torn between using Heimdal and MIT. On the one hand, I really like > to use the packages supplied by the distro with as little > "customization" as possible, which in my case would be MIT. On the other > hand, my initial DC deployment using Slackware 14.1 back in 2014 > apparently did use Heimdal. And it appears

Hi everyone, Apologies in advance, this will be a bit long but I'm hoping to get some guidance and hints on usual practices for using Samba4 AD DC as an Idm for W10 laptops that might be on the road elsewhere.. As much as I have been using samba for file serving, a Samba AD DC is something new to me. I built a small Samba AD DC infrastructure to serve UIDs and Passwords (4 VMs on 4 KVM