search for: transaction_cancel

...at . ./../lib/ldb/ldb_mdb/ldb_mdb.c:203 File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/sernet/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 279, in _run return self. run(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/sernet/samba/netcmd/domain/functional_prep.py", line 137, in run samdb.transaction_cancel() *O DC And CN I put X just to not expose the company I work for. Thanks Felipe Ribeiro de Oliveira feliperibeiro.ti at gmail.com

...39;t work like that in python -- they are not transactions, just a kind of goto-on-error. So the deletion of the original object is never going to be rolled back, control-C or not. We *could* make it a transaction, by sprinkling `samdb.transaction_start()`, `samdb.transaction_commit()`, `samdb.transaction_cancel()` around in the right places (which could let control-C cancel the whole thing, but ). In any case, DNS still looks like the problem. Douglas

...at . ./../lib/ldb/ldb_mdb/ldb_mdb.c:203 File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/sernet/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 279, in _run return self. run(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/sernet/samba/netcmd/domain/functional_prep.py", line 137, in run samdb.transaction_cancel() *O DC And CN I put X just to not expose the company I work for. Felipe Ribeiro de Oliveira feliperibeiro.ti at gmail.com

...n -- they are not > transactions, just a kind of goto-on-error. So the deletion of the > original object is never going to be rolled back, control-C or not. > > We *could* make it a transaction, by sprinkling > `samdb.transaction_start()`, `samdb.transaction_commit()`, > `samdb.transaction_cancel()` around in the right places (which could > let control-C cancel the whole thing, but ). > > In any case, DNS still looks like the problem. > > Douglas > > Hi Douglas, Yes, now I stop and really think about it, using 'try' requires transactions to back out, so I...

On 2019-11-13 09:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Regarding your problem, on linux I use lslocks to debug from here, you > can normally work out which process is holding the lock, which lock it > is waiting on (if any, marked with a *) and gdb that to work out what > is the matter with it, and perhaps why it is in that situation. Hmm... I have no lslocks on FreeBSD; will lsof do? In

...#39;.ldb', lp=lp) > logger.info('Starting transaction on ' + secrets_path) > secrets_obj.transaction_start() > self.offline_tdb_copy(secrets_path + '.ldb') > self.offline_tdb_copy(secrets_path + '.tdb') > secrets_obj.transaction_cancel() Could the problem be here? I'm not attempting to alter this, before understanding it fully, though. bye & Thanks av.

...; > logger.info('Starting transaction on ' + secrets_path) > > secrets_obj.transaction_start() > > self.offline_tdb_copy(secrets_path + '.ldb') > > self.offline_tdb_copy(secrets_path + '.tdb') > > secrets_obj.transaction_cancel() > > Could the problem be here? > I'm not attempting to alter this, before understanding it fully, though. Is tdbbackup the one provided by the Samba build, or an earlier (system) version? We had to change the lock behaviour in tdb to make this work, if you ran an older version it...

Hi all, As per Jelmer's request - in response to bug #7455 attached diff file. Please let me know what you think and if any modificationes need to be performed Regards Luk -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: newusergroupadv.diff URL:

...c:203 > File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/sernet/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", > line 279, in _run > return self. run(*args, **kwargs) > File > "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/sernet/samba/netcmd/domain/functional_prep.py", > line 137, in run > samdb.transaction_cancel() we have had this issue at another client earlier and Andr?as here digged into this issue [1]. There is a compile time constant in LMDB lib that is too low for large samba Domain. I think you just have to upgrade LMDB. Looking at your python 3.6 I guess you are still on CentOS7, then you can...

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:34:39 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:35:40 +1300 > Douglas Bagnall via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 19/11/24 02:40, Heinz H?lzl via samba wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > I have to delete about 6000 old machine accounts. > > > > >