search for: tranfert

Hello, I am in the process of upgrading one single DC (internal DNS) to 4.8.12. I have followed the procedure of adding a new DC, transfert FSMO roles and demote the old DC. Everything gone right (except at the tranfert FSMO step where I faced the problem described here https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-August/210140.html , this bug subsists in 4.8.12 , maybe it has been fixed in later release ? At the end , I have all roles transfered ok to the new DC). After the demote step, I followed the wiki https:/...

...t via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am in the process of upgrading one single DC (internal DNS) to 4.8.12. > > > > I have followed the procedure of adding a new DC, transfert FSMO roles > > and demote the old DC. > > Everything gone right (except at the tranfert FSMO step where I faced > > the problem described here > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-August/210140.html , this > > bug subsists in 4.8.12 , maybe it has been fixed in later release ? At > > the end , I have all roles transfered ok to the new DC). > > &...

On 05/08/2019 07:48, henri transfert via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I am in the process of upgrading one single DC (internal DNS) to 4.8.12. > > I have followed the procedure of adding a new DC, transfert FSMO roles and > demote the old DC. > Everything gone right (except at the tranfert FSMO step where I faced the > problem described here > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-August/210140.html , this bug > subsists in 4.8.12 , maybe it has been fixed in later release ? At the end > , I have all roles transfered ok to the new DC). > > After the demote step...

Hi, We are using attended call transfer to transfer the call. In the direct call, the quality of the voice and dtmf are acceptable. After transfer, the quality becomes worst. Voice can't be heard clearly and dtmf wrong detection will occur sometime. I wonder call transfer will affect he quality of the call. Anyone has same experience? Anything to do in asterisk level can get a better

...st conf SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 #second conf SO_RCVBUF=20480 SO_SNDBUF=20480 #thirth conf SO_RCVBUF=100000 SO_SNDBUF=100000 #and with : socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE oplocks = 0 level2 oplocks =0 i don't know my samba is so late or refuse the tranfert of file > at 1 mo my server conf line : iCORE 5 2TO DD 32 GO de ram i become crazy .... :( can you help me for my problem ? thank for advance best regard -- Alexandre Priou Analyste Concepteur Web 64 rue de l'Essonne 91000 ?vry tel_perso : 06.14.83.81.03

...sic configuration to do with samba in order to make my trining segment work the way its should work (meaning a secondary dns for this segment, stuff like that). All your comments will be very appreciated - I see in the the smb.conf a wins proxy option. For what I know on NT a wins proxy is used to tranfert wins request to a wins server but it's not be the case with this option, can someone explain to me this option ? Thanks to all Romain P?lissier Administrateur Syst?mes System Administrator T 514.333.6600 # 126 F 514.333.1080 Romain.Pelissier@sqliaison.com http://www.sqliaison.com/...

...sic configuration to do with samba in order to make my trining segment work the way its should work (meaning a secondary dns for this segment, stuff like that). All your comments will be very appreciated - I see in the the smb.conf a wins proxy option. For what I know on NT a wins proxy is used to tranfert wins request to a wins server but it's not be the case with this option, can someone explain to me this option ? Thanks to all Romain P?lissier Administrateur Syst?mes System Administrator T 514.333.6600 # 126 F 514.333.1080 Romain.Pelissier@sqliaison.com http://www.sqliaison.com/...

...rted the NTFS keys in a pfx file. could it help copy the file? the aim is that files must be crypted on laptops hard drive so if it is stolen then no data is compromised. Having the file not crypted on the backup server is not a problem. Right now, I get a smbclient timeout after 20000 msec and tranfert is aborted, thus the backup fails. At least, is there a way to report a permission denied for the crypted files and continue with other files? thanks for any tips. -- Olivier LAHAYE Motorola Labs IT manager Saclay, FRANCE

Hi, if I dial meetme from extension 200 directly it works ok - I get moh as only user (first trace). If I dial to other local extension and trasfer from there I get second trace... Apparent difference between those two is warning : Jan 27 11:06:33 WARNING[6133]: res_musiconhold.c:466 moh_alloc: No class: random What this could mean ? Direct Call log-----------------------------------------: