Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "traffi".
Did you mean:
traffic
2024 Feb 17
1
Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?
On Feb 17, 2024, at 11:17?AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> I would guess that reply-to is getting added because of header munging.
> Turn off munging and this all goes away.
Please re-read my email that explains the current setup of the list: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2024-February/013560.html
TL;DR we are not root on the mailing list server.
This has worked out
2024 Feb 17
1
Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?
...Price <roger at rogerprice.org>
>> To: nut-upsuser Mailing List <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>
>> Subject: ...
>
> Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the list.
> Many mailing lists encourage the subscribers to "keep the list traffic
> on the list", rather than wandering off into private discussions.? The
> nut-upsuser setup has exactly the opposite effect.
>
> Is it the intention to send the subscibers into private conversation?
> If not, and I suspect not, then the current Reply-To looks like a bug....
2024 Feb 17
1
Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?
I would guess that reply-to is getting added because of header munging.
Turn off munging and this all goes away.
2024 Feb 17
1
Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?
...rice <roger at rogerprice.org>
> > To: nut-upsuser Mailing List <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> > Subject: ...
>
> Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the list.
> Many mailing lists encourage the subscribers to "keep the list traffic on
> the
> list", rather than wandering off into private discussions. The
> nut-upsuser
> setup has exactly the opposite effect.
>
> Is it the intention to send the subscibers into private conversation? If
> not,
> and I suspect not, then the current Reply-To looks l...
2024 Feb 17
2
Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?
On Feb 17, 2024, at 7:57?AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>
> Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes "as is", not sure we can configure much about it. Can check, but not really inclined to - let humans decide how to best post and what is correct for each case :)
>
Jim,
I think this made more sense before, when the mailing list didn't *add* a
2024 Feb 17
5
Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?
...;
> Reply-To: Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org>
> To: nut-upsuser Mailing List <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> Subject: ...
Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the list.
Many mailing lists encourage the subscribers to "keep the list traffic on the
list", rather than wandering off into private discussions. The nut-upsuser
setup has exactly the opposite effect.
Is it the intention to send the subscibers into private conversation? If not,
and I suspect not, then the current Reply-To looks like a bug.
Any replies to the list...
2002 Mar 14
1
little dude about how classify traffic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am doing some experiments with HTB nad I have the next dude:
I only make experiments with ssh traffic for the momment.
If I want to classify that traffic do I need to do rules to the rest?
I don''t know if you understand my idea.
- --
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Luis Miguel Cruz. |
|...