search for: traffc

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "traffc".

Did you mean: traffic
2005 Feb 23
3
Send outgoing calls to a SIP gateway
How do I route all the outgoing calls through a SIP gateway, this should send more than one outgoing call to the sip gateway at once. please show me the sample configurations on how to do this. my SIP gatway can accecpt direct IP traffic or SIP proxy traffc. Thank You Kanishka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050223/6f9ff4c3/attachment.htm
2007 Jun 07
3
Wan optimizations with linux
Hi, I''m researching for WAN optimizations with linux. My network is composed for MPLS network connecting 200 branches against a central site. I use Linux machines to provide security with IPSEC in the branches and in the central site. Now I''m lookup for techniques for optimization the link. My first ideas was use IPCOMP and proxy to cache traffic of HTTP applications. Somebody
2006 Dec 28
1
How to add a route to a network via 2 gateways.
Hi iproute2, I have a network to reach which is 192.168.2.0/24. It is a branch of the company. I have currently added a route to that network via one gateway ( 192.168.0.254) in following way. ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.0.254 Now, We got another gateway which is 192.168.0.250. Now I want to add a route to the same network which is 192.168.2.0/24 via this gateway ( 192.168.0.250)
2006 Dec 30
0
RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 23, Issue 30
...ary path ? Is it weight 1 ? Is it the lower number which becomes primary ? Then , in my case, is the following coomad is right? ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 scope global nexthop via 192.168.0.254 dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 192.168.0.250 dev eth0 weight 100 I guess with the above command that traffc will flow via primary, when it fails , traffic will flow via secondary. That is what I need. Am I right ? Then can I acheive this goal ? Thanks Indunil ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex at milivojevic.org> Date: Dec 30, 2006 3:37 AM Subject: Re: [...