search for: traction

...on a computer on my internal network that has a different password. I have tried download.file and read.csv to no avail. When use this link in explorer it will prompt me for a username/password: file://hs9999-907/D$/protein%20Maintenance%20Logs/123.txt Then it lets me through. I cannot get any R traction on where I might be going wrong or a command that might work. Thanks, Rob S. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Link-to-a-Network-computer-tp4392223p4392223.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

..., we're supposed to be tagging 'final' on Wednesday. Unfortunately, I suspect we will be a little late. There are currently 32 open release blockers: https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?f1=blocked&o1=equals&v1=33849&query_format=advanced&resolution=--- Some of those have traction, but many don't. Some just need bisection, checking if the issue still reproduces, etc. Please help take a look at the bugs in that list. It would be really great if we could drive it down to zero blockers and tag rc3 by the end of the week. Many thanks, Hans

I've got a USB to serial adapter that I picked up from Radio Shack earlier this year. The updated pl2303 driver is already in the mainstream kernel as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429652 but I'm not getting much traction from Red Hat as far as them updating the kernel. So every time there's an updated kernel, I have to rebuild the srpm. I figure that this is the kind of situation that -plus is meant to solve... I've already had to switch one of my boxes over to plus today given that the video4linux srpm (...

Hi all, I've been waiting for almost three months now to get a patch committed to LLVM that fixes what I consider to be a fairly significant bug in the JIT (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13678) but I've been having a hard time getting traction on it. So far Duncan Sands is the only one who has given it any attention, but as of the last time I checked it still wasn't committed and the bug is still open. Right now we ship our code with a patch to fix this in 3.1, I really don't want to have to do that again for 3.2. I appreciate...

I''ve asked this in various ways but I can''t seem to get much traction - my guess is because not many people are doing this. I am working in a controller/views called placements. Placements belongs_to :client I have a clients model/table - clients has_many :placements in placements/find...this works fine... <%= text_field_with_auto_complete :placement, :clwholena...

...se unto itself. When we're ready for 6.04, release 6.04, merge mutlifs, release 6.10, and probably update gnu-efi and release 6.11. Both of these change enough that they may have large impacts and warrant separation. I think HPA does have the right idea. Make a multifs branch to give it more traction and exposure. -- -Gene

...lt;mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 1, 2016, at 7:42 AM, C Bergström via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I still don't see why >> they can't fork it on github or create a project to let it bake and >> get some users or traction. > > The intent may be that instead of creating a separate community of users, it'd create its community inside the llvm projects community. That looks like a nice "feature" long term. > > Cost/benefit: cost is not really existent, potential benefits are interesting. Not...

..., On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:15:22PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > If you believe that variable sized structs are a feature that is missing > in LLVM, then that's another discussion. However, LLVM needs to remain > "low level" and it is unlikely such a feature would gain much traction > since a combination of existing features can accomplish the same thing. The only alternative so far in our case seems to be this one (quoting from a previous e-mail): > 4. Implement variable sized fields as separately allocated arrays so > that your example becomes: > %struct.array...

Hi, I'm getting almost daily smb crashes in 4.5.10 and not sure where to start looking; raised it in my distro but not getting any traction. Any help appreciated. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465523

The G.729.1 "wideband" codec is starting to show a slight bit of traction. There is a possibility that Asterisk could support G.729.1 - would you use it or buy it if it was available? More importantly, does any equipment with which your systems currently exchange traffic support G.729.1? Currently, the number of devices supporting G.729.1 seems to be fairly li...

...> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a9/builds/4305 > > Clang :: CodeGen/compound-assign-overflow.c > LLVM :: Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/post-inc-icmpzero.ll > LLVM :: Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/2012-07-18-LimitReassociate.ll Usually the best way to get traction on such things is to reply to the commit that caused the regression. Whoever broke things is usually more invested in making sure the change is solid (& doesn't get reverted). [slightly ranting point: Whoever owns this builder should be in a position of authority/autonomy with the project...

On 12 November 2013 16:05, Frank Winter <fwinter at jlab.org> wrote: > engineBuilder.setMCPU(llvm::sys::getHostCPUName()); > Try: engineBuilder.setMAttrs("-avx"); --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131112/4b00aed7/attachment.html>

Porting my project from JIT to MCJIT did not fix the code generation bug Frank is also experiencing. However, Renato's "-avx" suggestion did resolve the issue for me. Hopefully we can get some traction on this bug, happy to help where possible! v/r, Josh -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/Limit-loop-vectorizer-to-SSE-tp63175p63205.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

@Dmitry, you may get more traction by reporting this issue (with patch) at https://www.openssh.com/report.html . It can also help other folks who may be encountering the same issue. -- jmk > On Mar 3, 2023, at 02:10, Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs at redhat.com> wrote: > > ?Dear colleagues, > > Could you plea...

Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82. Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is 2.6.9_78.0.5.plus.c4. Latest drbd82 kmod is also for 78.0.5. I know there was a mention on the list that these modules are not kernel dependent anymore... but yum and rpm seem to indicate

1. Is ahsetup.exe this program? http://cleansofts.org/download/air-hunter.html 2. Is closeapp.exe this program? http://www.traction-software.co.uk/closeapp/ Because it looks to me like you must have installed closeapp.exe (or perhaps some other program that included it) at some point, and now it's doing exactly what it's designed to do, shut down running Windows processes, in this case ahsetup.exe. The solution would b...

I didn''t get much traction on this so I am trying again... I am working on an application where there are many different screens to access the data in a particular record/row. I have links to each data entry screen at the top. Is there a way to detect whether the current hash has been changed from the stored record so I can...

...blications in which the nonconvergence rate was as high or higher. I just don't believe that's right, and if some problem is posed so that the estimate is not obtained in such a large sample of applications, it either means the problem is badly asked or badly answered. But I've got no traction unless I can actually do better.... Perhaps I can use this opportunity to learn about R functions like optim, or perhaps maxLik. >From reading r-help, it seems to me there are some basic tips for optimization, such as: 1. It is wise to scale the data so that all columns have the same range be...

...ly that "under the covers" GCC and C99 are using similar techniques. If you believe that variable sized structs are a feature that is missing in LLVM, then that's another discussion. However, LLVM needs to remain "low level" and it is unlikely such a feature would gain much traction since a combination of existing features can accomplish the same thing. However, I'll ask other LLVMers weigh in on that discussion. Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Th...

...12 November 2013 21:10, Josh Klontz <josh.klontz at gmail.com> wrote: > Porting my project from JIT to MCJIT did not fix the code generation bug > Frank is also experiencing. However, Renato's "-avx" suggestion did resolve > the issue for me. Hopefully we can get some traction on this bug, happy to > help where possible! > Hi Josh, Frank, Glad to see you can continue with your work, regardless of the AVX bug. It would be great if you guys could reduce the IR and report the AVX bug in bugzilla, I'm hoping you both found the same error (fingers crossed), but fe...