Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "tractible".
Did you mean:
tractable
2014 Aug 22
4
[LLVMdev] Addressing const reference in ArrayRef
...t; This would cause a lot of churn though -- ArrayRefs are *usually*
> temporaries. Although this makes sense to me, disallowing named
> ArrayRefs might be more practical.
Yeah, I'm not sure how practical that is either - we have (guessing)
quite a few named ArrayRefs... but it might be tractible to remove
them. Not sure how I feel about that.
2014 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] Addressing const reference in ArrayRef
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> Is there some way we can get lifetime extension of temporaries to kick in
> here?
Nope - since the temporary is a subexpression - not the thing being declared.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:05 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah - I suspect there are just