search for: traceabl

I have the following models class Recipe < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :ingredient_recipes has_many :ingredients, :through => :ingredient_recipes end class IngredientRecipe < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :ingredient belongs_to :recipe end class Ingredient < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :ingredient_recipes has_many :recipes, :through => :ingredient_recipes

...dbObjectId") object="refClassRepresentation" object="refMethodDef" object="refObjectGenerator" object="signature" object="sourceEnvironment" object="standardGeneric" (inherited from: object="genericFunction") object="traceable" (2) > showMethods('show') Function: show (package methods) object="ANY" object="classGeneratorFunction" object="classRepresentation" (2 methods defined for this signature, with different packages) object="envRefClass" object="generic...

...> >> When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a >> call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction >> takes 6 bytes instead of 5 on the usual relative call. >> >> With this change, function tracing supports 6 bytes on traceable >> function and can still replace relative calls on the ftrace assembly >> functions. >> >> Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the >> KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. > > Question: This 6 bytes is only the i...

...> >> When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a >> call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction >> takes 6 bytes instead of 5 on the usual relative call. >> >> With this change, function tracing supports 6 bytes on traceable >> function and can still replace relative calls on the ftrace assembly >> functions. >> >> Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the >> KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. > > Question: This 6 bytes is only the i...

...believe the second forked process is the one that winds up having a failing call to libpkcs11`<routine>. Of course, when I start dtrace, the forked process is not yet created, so I can not specify that. Also, it appears I can not just trace on libpkcs11`<routine> as libpkcs11 is only traceable with a process that has it loaded. So, the questions are: How can I get dtrace to follow and trace forked processes? How can I get dtrace to trace anything with libpkcs11 for any process that is running or will be created and running in the future on a system? Peter

Hi Friend, Send me matching profiles in below mentioned skill matrix form. Full Legal Name: Contact Mobile No: Contact Home No: Email ID: Current Location: Ready for Relocation: Rate: Total IT Exp: Total US Exp: SR QA Lead Exp: Quality Center Exp: Training, mentoring, and coaching Exp: Quick Test Professional (beyond "record and playback") Exp: Performance testing

My company is trying to manage R installations across a number large SMP machines. We're thinking out the best way to manage the packages installs and updates. They would be happy if we could work out RPM's for package installations (traceable, easily facilitated with existing sw management tools). I don't know a lot and RPMs beyond how to use them, but it seems plausible to write R code to create the RPM package. If we need to update package X, which triggers and update of ancillary packages Y and Z, it should be possible to use a...

...dows are likely to be frozen until the first one completes, as is any file dialog in another application. I also have sporadic cases where double-clicking on a file name takes 30-60 seconds or more to bring up the application whereas normally it is more or less instantaneous. The most specific traceable behavior is that if one has a PowerDesk window open on the Solaris box and is scrolling through the directories, when the directory /net comes into view, there is a very long pause and a full refresh of the window, often with a partial refresh, pause, then completion of refresh. This is highl...

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Arjen de Korte wrote: > We need a pre3 to fix this since this has been a long standing bug. This > path is hardcoded in the example configuration, where running > ./configure should set this path properly. In fact, Charles fixed this > in the trunk, but apparently we didn't backport the fix to Testing. Good > catch! I apologize for not

Hi List, I'm currently backing up a number of samba servers onto a remote server using a perl script called rsnapshot which utilises rsync. Over the last few i've started using posix ACL's on my samba server and now I would like to be able to back up these ACLS's. All of my servers are have their filesystems (ext3) mounted with ACL support and i am using the following version

For reference: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/10 On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:09 AM, Baruch Even <baruch at ev-en.org> wrote: > Hi, > > There is one issue that I would consider as a major issue and not fixed yet. It is the use of wall time for scheduling ups polls instead of a monotonic clock source. I provided a (partial) patch in the past and I believe there was some

...headers. > As far as I understand it's related to the fact that the file itself > used to be the only source of information about where the code came > from. Nowadays we have more information in git. > > The reason all this is happening is to be able to prove that there > is traceable source of the code, right? I, personally, do not > really like when you get couple of lines of repeated information on > every start of the tool (`bc` should only ever be ran with `-q` for > any sane person). In my opinion that is never going to help any > user. > > All of this...

...to be a practical introduction to the task of building a garbage collector in LLVM: http://wiki.llvm.org/Building_a_stack_crawler_in_LLVM Here's a sample of one of the unit tests. It's checking that the tracer can properly distinguish between two states of a union, one state having a traceable object (a String), and the other state containing a non-traceable value (a float): def testCollectUnionLocalVar { var u:String or float = newString("Hello"); tart.gc.GC.collect(); assertTrue(u isa String); assertEq("Hello", typecast[String](u)); u = 1.0;...

...next step for LLVM GC would be elimination of the reload > penalty for using GC intrinsics with a copying collector. This, again, > requires that the code generator perform bookkeeping for GC pointers. Elimination of the reload penalty is impossible, unless the GC can be informed about traceable objects in registers. > > I'm not sure where such vociferous concern on this subject arises. All > the extant collector plugins I'm aware of operate in conjunction with > the target-independent framework and require exactly zero code within > each target backend. No...

Excuse dopey question. I'm not exactly clear about certificates. Apache2 default install has this snake oil certificate Can make a new one for apache Can make one for dovecot Can make one for ssl Is there supposed to be the one (self signed ) certificate pair in one place for the machine that each process hands out ? Can they be moved to another machine ? mick -- Key ID C7D6E24C

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 1/30/20 8:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Fast testing whether the AIO buffer (or regions within it) contain all > >zeroes, which allows Python code to quickly do sparsification when > >copying. > > > >This includes the iszero.h header from nbdkit which is distributed > >under a compatible

SO, my full load on my core UPS is two Dell R610s, one Sun X4540, one HP DL360p gen8, two six-core Thuban-II workstations plua their monitors, and the network stack and KVM. The APC SU3000RM (3KVA) that blew up last week considered this to be just short of 60% load. The new Cyberpower PR3000 (also 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. I wasn't

Good Day all, I have a Fractional PRI connected to my Asterisk Box via a T100P card. When I initiate a call out to phone number 123-8888 the call sounds great no echo what so ever. If the person at 123-8888 hangs up and calls me right back (same handset on both sides) same trunk line The call always has echo on it. The Asterisk sip extension hears them selves echoing. The remote party

...R3000 (also 3KVA), wqhich operates at a 90% power > factor, considers this same load to be 43% load. > > I wasn't expecting that much of a reduction. So... 50% load +/- 10% :-) (The use of the term "calibration" for an UPS is slightly unfortunate - it's certainly not a traceable metrology-style calibration. I would not be surprised if most of the passives were 5-10% tolerance, and not temperature compensated.) > I have the snmp-ups driver working with it, have not enabled upsmon yet, > but upsc seems to get a rather limited set of data from it: ... > In particul...

...t google.com> wrote: > When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a > call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction > takes 6 bytes instead of 5 on the usual relative call. > > With this change, function tracing supports 6 bytes on traceable > function and can still replace relative calls on the ftrace assembly > functions. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. Question: This 6 bytes is only the initial call that gcc creates...