Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "trace_hypercall".
2010 Dec 14
0
trace_var per hypercall
...m xc_save. That works as expected.
However, it adds additional pressure on the tracebuffer because each
hypercall is traced as well. My question is:
Would an additional domctrl (or whatever), or another trace hypercall be
acceptable? Another hypercall would at least have a chance to be ignored
by trace_hypercall() without poking into other hypercalls internals.
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel