Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "tpo2".
Did you mean:
tpo
2006 Dec 14
3
Stubbing constructiors
This works:
class X
def X.initialize( stuff )
end
end
X.initialize("bla")
However stubbing it doesn,t:
require ''test/unit''
require ''stubba''
class X
def X.initialize( stuff )
end
end
class XTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
def test_
X.stubs(:initialize).with("bla")
2006 Dec 14
2
public SVN dead?
James Mead wrote:
> Trunk has moved on considerably since the last release. I really must
> get round to releasing again soon.
Righty, right. I''ve tried:
svn checkout svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/mocha
as documented here [1], but svn will just hang forever.
Accessing any of the following:
[svn|http[s]]://rubyforge.org/var/svn/mocha[/[trunk[/]]]
either through the svn
2006 Dec 13
1
Mocha: and there''s an "init.rb" in the SVN too
Sorry for the spam avalanche - there''s an init.rb file in the trunc SVN branch
too, which I''m not so sure about whether to include it or not in the Debian
package...
*t
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
2006 Dec 13
1
published Mocha tarball is missing the expamples/ dir
Hello James,
am trying to package Mocha for Debian and have noticed, that both the tarball
and the zip are missing the examples/ directory.
*t
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
2007 Jan 11
4
counter-intuitive behaveour when passing a proc to Mocha::Expectation#returns
Let''s say that I have a procedure that:
* gets the number of bytes to write into some file
* and returns the number of successfully written bytes
def save( text, len )
This procedure is being used all over the place especially inside the method
"process" which I want to test. Thus in order not to polute my filesystem I stub
the "save" procedure. But of course in
2006 Dec 14
1
Patch: make rdoc of lib/mocha/object.rb instead of lib/stubba/object.rb
Index: Rakefile
===================================================================
--- Rakefile (revision 73)
+++ Rakefile (working copy)
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
task.rdoc_dir = ''doc''
task.template = "html_with_google_analytics"
task.options << "--line-numbers" << "--inline-source"
-
2015 May 25
2
fsck failing to notice that the block device was pulled out from under it?
Hello,
tl;dr: it seems like fsck fails to notice when the block device
disappears from under it.
I have the following setup:
* external USB disk
* a partition with LUKS in it
* ext4 filesystem inside the LUKS block device
While doing backups to it I noticed that after some time backups would
fail with an error (failed to write, ).
In the following log I'm attaching the disk, enabling LUKS