search for: tpm_privat

Hi! Think I found a reference to the problem(s) I am seeing with xen-tpmfront in my setup on the net: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9485637/ This patch has not been officially entered and it is not included in the kernel provided in SIG virt either Can we please get it in ? Best Dag

...: =================================== diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c index 5aaa268..dd83a07 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int setup_ring(struct xenbus_device *dev, struct tpm_private *priv) return -ENOMEM; } - rv = xenbus_grant_ring(dev, &priv->shr, 1, &gref); + rv = xenbus_grant_ring(dev, priv->shr, 1, &gref); if (rv < 0) return rv; ==================================== Best Dag

Since the vTPM implementations are being incorproated into Xen and possibly upstream Linux, I would like to see if this protocol change could be added before we have significant legacy implementations. If not, I still think it would be useful as either a v2 or negotiated protocol change. The current vTPM protocol is a copy of the network protocol. This was likely done for ease of implementation,

...ront.c b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c index c8ff4df..62e7d38 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include <xen/xenbus.h> #include <xen/page.h> #include "tpm.h" +#include <xen/platform_pci.h> struct tpm_private { struct tpm_chip *chip; @@ -421,6 +422,9 @@ static int __init xen_tpmfront_init(void) if (!xen_domain()) return -ENODEV; + if (!xen_has_pv_devices()) + return -ENODEV; + return xenbus_register_frontend(&tpmfront_driver); } module_init(xen_tpmfront_init); diff --git a/drivers/inp...