search for: tpkts

...ble >> wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see >> some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. >> - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge >> write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were >> increased). >> - Very minor rx regression in some cases. >> - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). > >Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: > >1) Guest TX >2) Guest RX >3) TCP_RR > >> size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/...

...ble >> wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see >> some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. >> - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge >> write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were >> increased). >> - Very minor rx regression in some cases. >> - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). > >Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: > >1) Guest TX >2) Guest RX >3) TCP_RR > >> size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/...

...lling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -...

...lling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +9%/ -17%/ +5%/ +10%/ -2% 64/ 2/ +8%/ -18%/ +6%/ +10%/ -1% 64/ 4/ +4%/ -21%/ +6%/ +10%/ -...

...te for the possible > wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see > some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. > - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge > write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were > increased). > - Very minor rx regression in some cases. > - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: 1) Guest TX 2) Guest RX 3) TCP_RR > size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ > 64/ 1/ +9%/...

...ts (%5 - 20%) for latency (TCP_RR). - Get a better or minor regression on most of the TX tests, but see some regression on 4096 size. - Except for 8 sessions of 4096 size RX, have a better or same performance. - CPU utilization were incrased as expected. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +8%/ -32%/ +8%/ +8%/ +7% 1/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 1/ 100/ +5%/ -21%/ +5%/ +5%/ 0% 1/ 200/ +5%/ -21%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 64/ 1/ +11%/ -29%/ +11%/ +11%/ +10% 64/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +8%/ +8...

...ts (%5 - 20%) for latency (TCP_RR). - Get a better or minor regression on most of the TX tests, but see some regression on 4096 size. - Except for 8 sessions of 4096 size RX, have a better or same performance. - CPU utilization were incrased as expected. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +8%/ -32%/ +8%/ +8%/ +7% 1/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 1/ 100/ +5%/ -21%/ +5%/ +5%/ 0% 1/ 200/ +5%/ -21%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% 64/ 1/ +11%/ -29%/ +11%/ +11%/ +10% 64/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +8%/ +8...

...wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see >>> some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. >>> - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge >>> write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were >>> increased). >>> - Very minor rx regression in some cases. >>> - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 16%). >> Forget to mention, the following test results by order are: >> >> 1) Guest TX >> 2) Guest RX >> 3) TCP_RR >> >>>...

...- Get a better or minor regression on most of the TX tests, but see > some regression on 4096 size. > - Except for 8 sessions of 4096 size RX, have a better or same > performance. > - CPU utilization were incrased as expected. > > TCP_RR: > size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ > 1/ 1/ +8%/ -32%/ +8%/ +8%/ +7% > 1/ 50/ +7%/ -19%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% > 1/ 100/ +5%/ -21%/ +5%/ +5%/ 0% > 1/ 200/ +5%/ -21%/ +7%/ +7%/ +1% > 64/ 1/ +11%/ -29%/ +11%/ +11%/ +10% > 64/...

...t of polling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 50%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 17%). Guest TX: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +18%/ -10%/ +7%/ +11%/ 0% 64/ 2/ +14%/ -13%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 64/ 4/ +8%/ -17%/ +7%/ +9%/ 0% 64/ 8/ +11%/ -15%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 256...

...t of polling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 50%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at most 17%). Guest TX: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 64/ 1/ +18%/ -10%/ +7%/ +11%/ 0% 64/ 2/ +14%/ -13%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 64/ 4/ +8%/ -17%/ +7%/ +9%/ 0% 64/ 8/ +11%/ -15%/ +7%/ +10%/ 0% 256...

...ck to back connected mlx4 - Guest with 8 vcpus and 1 queue Results: - TCP_RR was imporved obviously (at most 27%). And cpu utilizaton was also improved in this case. - No obvious differences in Guest RX throughput. - Guest TX throughput was also improved. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +27%/ 0%/ +27%/ +27%/ +25% 1/ 50/ +2%/ +1%/ +2%/ +2%/ -4% 1/ 100/ +2%/ +1%/ +3%/ +3%/ -14% 1/ 200/ +2%/ +2%/ +5%/ +5%/ -15% 64/ 1/ +20%/ -13%/ +20%/ +20%/ +20% 64/ 50/ +17%/ +14%/ +16%/ +16...

...ck to back connected mlx4 - Guest with 8 vcpus and 1 queue Results: - TCP_RR was imporved obviously (at most 27%). And cpu utilizaton was also improved in this case. - No obvious differences in Guest RX throughput. - Guest TX throughput was also improved. TCP_RR: size/session/+thu%/+normalize%/+tpkts%/+rpkts%/+ioexits%/ 1/ 1/ +27%/ 0%/ +27%/ +27%/ +25% 1/ 50/ +2%/ +1%/ +2%/ +2%/ -4% 1/ 100/ +2%/ +1%/ +3%/ +3%/ -14% 1/ 200/ +2%/ +2%/ +5%/ +5%/ -15% 64/ 1/ +20%/ -13%/ +20%/ +20%/ +20% 64/ 50/ +17%/ +14%/ +16%/ +16...