search for: tpasswd

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tpasswd".

Did you mean: passwd
2001 Apr 03
2
the "primes" file
In message <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104031615270.8678-100000 at holly.crl.go.jp>, Tom Holro yd writes: >SRP has different requirements from Diffie-Hellman. In particular, >for SRP the generator must be primitive. It turns out that the "primes" >file contains only safe primes with primitive generators, and is thus >ideal for SRP, but so far in OpenSSH it has only been used for
2001 Mar 30
2
BETA release of OpenSSH-2.5.2p2 with SRP
...ich provides strong authentication of the host key as well as the user verifier. This protects against spoofed servers even when the host key changes and/or the client doesn't know the host key. * Fully compatible with the Stanford SRP distribution, so if you already have an /etc/tpasswd file it'll get used (libsrp is NOT required). * No legal issues. Here's a quote from Tom Wu, the designer of SRP: "The past ambiguity has been resolved. SRP is royalty-free for commercial and non-commercial use worldwide. The licensing statements on the Web site, in...
2001 Apr 11
0
2nd BETA release of OpenSSH with SRP
...rver-spoofing attacks. * Authentication of the host key is built into the SRP exchange. This protects against spoofed servers even when the host key changes and/or the client doesn't know the host key. * Fully compatible with the Stanford SRP distribution, so if you already have an /etc/tpasswd file it'll get used (libsrp is NOT required). Changes from OpenSSH-2.5.2p2-srp5 to OpenSSH-2.5.4p1-srp6: * Major parameters are now wrapped in an SRP_CTX struct, and both the client and server sides were rewritten to use dispatching. * Config files (that store SRP parameters) must be own...
2001 May 01
3
SRP unencumbered license statement
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, RJ Atkinson wrote: > At 06:26 27/04/01, Tom Wu wrote: > >For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft > >and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I > >promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit, > >statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms. > >The
2009 Dec 17
4
NIS failover
We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed. It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind restart. It behaves as indicated in http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5084845 using ypbind-1.17.2-13 on Centos 4.5 / Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Nov