Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "tp51361p51363".
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Is this a missed (simple) optimization?
Hi,
If the function was called Test(&B) then the first store would affect
the second load.
Tim.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:58 AM, AnonW <wayne.phillips at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is a missed optimization, but maybe I'm missing some significant
> piece of knowledge(!) as to why this might not be optimizable :) Test
> case...
>
> int A; // some global
2012 Nov 16
3
[LLVMdev] Is this a missed (simple) optimization?
I think this is a missed optimization, but maybe I'm missing some significant
piece of knowledge(!) as to why this might not be optimizable :) Test
case...
int A; // some global
int B; // some global
void Test(int *Out)
{
*Out = A; // Can't this be optimized away?
*Out = B;
};
The LLVM backend (tested 3.1 and 3.0 online demo) doesn't optimize