Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "tp51361".
Did you mean:
51361
2012 Nov 16
3
[LLVMdev] Is this a missed (simple) optimization?
...kend (tested 3.1 and 3.0 online demo) doesn't optimize away the
first store, even with O3 level compiling in clang. Is there some valid
reason for this?
Any insight appreciated. Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/Is-this-a-missed-simple-optimization-tp51361.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] Is this a missed (simple) optimization?
...sn't optimize away the
> first store, even with O3 level compiling in clang. Is there some valid
> reason for this?
>
> Any insight appreciated. Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/Is-this-a-missed-simple-optimization-tp51361.html
> Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev