Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "tp46105p46144".
Did you mean:
tp46105p46108
2012 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] DFAPacketizer with StateTrans != 0 Assertion
Hi sam,
On 12/06/2012 17:30, sam wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
> The assertion was happening because I wasn't checking after the first
> attempt failed. The first packet was failing and so it was ended, and
> then the packetizer attempted to add it to the next packet without
> checking for available resources. However this highlights probably the
> real problem - my packetizer
2012 Jun 12
3
[LLVMdev] DFAPacketizer with StateTrans != 0 Assertion
Hi Ivan,
The assertion was happening because I wasn't checking after the first
attempt failed. The first packet was failing and so it was ended, and
then the packetizer attempted to add it to the next packet without
checking for available resources. However this highlights probably the
real problem - my packetizer is unable to find resources for the first
instruction, or any of my