search for: tp33375005p33378554

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tp33375005p33378554".

2012 Feb 23
1
[LLVMdev] Simple question on sign
...gt; > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Simple-question-on-sign-tp33375005p33378554.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2012 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] Simple question on sign
Hi Sam, I am not a MIPS expert by any means, so YMMV, but: MIPS addu only differs to "add" in its (non)setting of the overflow flag. Because LLVM doesn't provide a way via the IR to access the overflow flag, a special notation isn't required in the IR to distinguish the two operations. Do you have another example? Cheers, James -----Original Message----- From:
2012 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] Simple question on sign
Thanks for the replies guys but I think I should have phrased my question better... looking at the Mips backend there are machine instructions that operate on signed and unsigned data, such as add and addu. And like Mips, I need to specify unsigned specific instructions, so how do these get chosen between if the LLVM IR does not carry type data? A very general point in the right direction is all i