Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tp32889812p33544612".
2011 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] Problem using a label to a MachineBasicBlock
Using 'NEW_BB->setIsLandingPad(true);' seems to resolve everything.
Greetings,
Jeroen Dobbelaere
[...]
2012 Mar 22
1
[LLVMdev] Problem using a label to a MachineBasicBlock
...____________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Problem-using-a-label-to-a-MachineBasicBlock-tp32889812p33544612.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2011 Nov 30
2
[LLVMdev] Problem using a label to a MachineBasicBlock
Hi all,
I think that I came somewhat closer to a solution for splitting a
MachineBasicBlock for a PSEUDO_CALL_R instruction and having a label to the new MBB:
For following piece of code:
---
typedef int callme_t(int a, int b);
callme_t* c01;
int foo(int a, int b)
{
return c01(a,b); // MachineBasicBlock will be split at call instruction
}
---
I have initially following correspondence:
BB1