search for: tp30046067p30059252

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tp30046067p30059252".

2010 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Xinfinity wrote: > > > Devang Patel wrote: >> >> >> What are you going to do if "optimized LLVM code" is hoisted above or >> sinked below LLVM_dummy_inst by the optimizer ? It seems you are looking >> for a way communicate some info for a block of instructions. If that is >> the case then one solution is to
2010 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
Devang Patel wrote: > > > What are you going to do if "optimized LLVM code" is hoisted above or > sinked below LLVM_dummy_inst by the optimizer ? It seems you are looking > for a way communicate some info for a block of instructions. If that is > the case then one solution is to extract interesting block of instructions > in a separate function and make sure that
2010 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
...the IRBuilder to check the boolean and attach metadata if necessary. But I think this is too specialized to my particular needs and it would not be a good solution. Is there a cleaner method? Thanks, Alexandra -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Prevent-instruction-elimination-tp30046067p30059252.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.