Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tp30046067p30059252".
2010 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
On Oct 25, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Xinfinity wrote:
>
>
> Devang Patel wrote:
>>
>>
>> What are you going to do if "optimized LLVM code" is hoisted above or
>> sinked below LLVM_dummy_inst by the optimizer ? It seems you are looking
>> for a way communicate some info for a block of instructions. If that is
>> the case then one solution is to
2010 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
Devang Patel wrote:
>
>
> What are you going to do if "optimized LLVM code" is hoisted above or
> sinked below LLVM_dummy_inst by the optimizer ? It seems you are looking
> for a way communicate some info for a block of instructions. If that is
> the case then one solution is to extract interesting block of instructions
> in a separate function and make sure that
2010 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
...the IRBuilder to check
the boolean and attach metadata if necessary. But I think this is too
specialized to my particular needs and it would not be a good solution.
Is there a cleaner method?
Thanks,
Alexandra
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Prevent-instruction-elimination-tp30046067p30059252.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.