search for: tp30046067p30051017

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tp30046067p30051017".

2010 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Xinfinity wrote: > Devang Patel wrote: >> >> >> Use of metadata will not prevent optimizer from removing an instruction. >> Actually, that is the corner stone of LLVM metadata design. >> >> I am curious, what information you want to carry and until what point ? >> - >> Devang >> >> > > I want
2010 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
Devang Patel wrote: > > > Use of metadata will not prevent optimizer from removing an instruction. > Actually, that is the corner stone of LLVM metadata design. > > I am curious, what information you want to carry and until what point ? > - > Devang > > I want to handle new pragma inserted in the C/C++ source code and to adapt clang to transform them in
2010 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] Prevent instruction elimination
...you consider it would be a better idea to attach metadata to all instructions emitted between source_location marking the beginning and the source_location marking the end of the region? Thank you, Alexandra -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Prevent-instruction-elimination-tp30046067p30051017.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.