Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tp29935454p29942642".
2010 Oct 12
1
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
...>
>
> Devang
>
>
>
I will use the pass -reg2mem, as suggested by ether, to avoid to PHI nodes
altogether.
Thanks,
Alexandra
-
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Specify-dominator-for-BasicBlock-to-avoid-%22Instruction-does-not-dominate-all-uses%21%22-tp29935454p29942642.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2010 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
On Oct 11, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Xinfinity wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a pass aimed to unify multiple exits of a loop into a unique
> basic block. The approach is straight forward:
> I create a unique BasicBlock BB_unique that has as predecessors all the exit
> blocks of the loop, it contains a phi instruction and a switch to redirect
> the flow correctly.
2010 Oct 11
3
[LLVMdev] Specify dominator for BasicBlock to avoid "Instruction does not dominate all uses!"
Hi,
I am working on a pass aimed to unify multiple exits of a loop into a unique
basic block. The approach is straight forward:
I create a unique BasicBlock BB_unique that has as predecessors all the exit
blocks of the loop, it contains a phi instruction and a switch to redirect
the flow correctly. Additionally, for each initial exit block I create an
associated block that will jump to the