search for: tp24778261p24788337

...tains the error handling (that the runtime check jumpts to on failure). Just putting another MachineBasicBlock at the beginning of some arbitrary MachineFunction doesn't seem to be the right way to go, does it? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/code-altering-Passes-for-llc-tp24778261p24788337.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On Aug 2, 2009, at 7:09 AM, Artjom Kochtchi wrote: > > Greetinigs, > > I am extending llc to include runtime checks for calls (in X86). So > a call > 'call target' is altered to look like this: > > [some check] > jne error_function > call target > > I've done this by implementing a MachineFunctionPass that is > instantiated > and added

...dling (that the runtime check jumpts to on failure). Just putting another > MachineBasicBlock at the beginning of some arbitrary MachineFunction doesn't > seem to be the right way to go, does it? > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/code-altering-Passes-for-llc-tp24778261p24788337.html > Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >

Greetinigs, I am extending llc to include runtime checks for calls (in X86). So a call 'call target' is altered to look like this: [some check] jne error_function call target I've done this by implementing a MachineFunctionPass that is instantiated and added to the PassManager in X86TargetMachine::addPreRegAlloc. In order to create the jne-instruction I need some BasicBlock