search for: tp23966736p23992064

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Nyx<mcheva at cs.mcgill.ca> wrote: > Thus, I need to know how I can define a struct dynamically without having to > write LLVM assembly (is there an API for doing this?), whether or not LLVM > functions can actually return those on the stack, as well as how I can read > and write values to the struct. There's a C++ API for everything you can

...t now, as a potential solution, I'm actually considering allocating the structure on the calling side and passing a pointer to it instead, but perhaps there's a better way to go about this. - Max -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Defining-Accessing-Structs-Dynamically-tp23966736p23992064.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Sorry for the high number of questions I've been posting lately! I'm currently facing a design problem. I'm making a JIT for a subset of the MATLAB language and in that language, functions can return many parameters. The issue is that they will not necessarily return *all* the parameters they could return. The actual number of returned parameters is defined at run-time. For speed, I