search for: tp19719560p19735721

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Matt Giuca <mattgiuca at gmail.com> wrote: > /* snip */ The language I am making is not a traditional scripting language, it is designed for heavy math work. It has not classes, the basic data structure is a struct, yet even those are only used to pass messages. It is using the Actor-Oriented model, not Object-Oriented. I have been creating it to deal

OvermindDL1 wrote: > > I know why it was removed, and it does make sense, just would be nice > if there was an option to be able to get two pointer to a specific > llvm::IntegerType, functionally they would be identical, but for user > code (hence, my code) would be useful as I could match it for the > different ones at generate different code for each. > Well a language

...g with each int (in an i32), store an i1 (bool) which specifies whether it is signed or unsigned, and have all relevant operations (such as division) depend upon that bool. Obviously this makes the language a lot higher level. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Integer-handling-tp19719560p19735721.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.