search for: tp19719560p19735288

I know why it was removed, and it does make sense, just would be nice if there was an option to be able to get two pointer to a specific llvm::IntegerType, functionally they would be identical, but for user code (hence, my code) would be useful as I could match it for the different ones at generate different code for each. With some discussion with others I think we came up with an acceptable

On Sep 29, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Scott Graham wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:41 AM, OvermindDL1 > <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> I have ended up making a rather complicated type system to handle >> quite a few things, all stemming from the fact that the integer type >> has no sign information (even if it did not use it, would be nice to >> look at it in

...completely type-checked program before it touches the LLVM API at all. The compiler should then always generate type-correct LLVM code (so your users should never see LLVM type errors, if your compiler is behaving correctly). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Integer-handling-tp19719560p19735288.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.