search for: tottering

Hi Guys, Thanks for Unicorn, it makes my world rock. You guy have done a wonderful job and also huge thanks to the predecessors too. The default timeout on my Rails app is 30 seconds. The app works fine most of the time but there are some parts of the app which are slow and occasionally totter over the 30 sec response time and timeout. Is there a clean way for me to hook into timeouts and notify

hi, I am using speex1.2beta2 on a TI 54x on narrow band I have been trying to get speex to work for a while now, and it's been a real teeter-totter ride. For a long time I noticed that I will get a project to work and then without changing any code and programming it to an eprom/flash the project will not work. It turns out it was a value called innov_save. I found this bugger by zero

Hi, Is it correct that it''s not possible to excecute Windows Commands directly with the puppet run? For example: exec { ''ExecCreatedFolder'': command => "mkdir C:\PuppetOrdner\ExecCreatedFolder", } I allways have to bind it with a .bat file right? file { ''c:/PuppetFolder/puppettest.bat'': ensure => file,

> I have been trying to get speex to work for a while now, and it's been > a real teeter-totter ride. For a long time I noticed that I will get a > project to work and then without changing any code and programming it to > an eprom/flash the project will not work. That's an Heisenbug and the most common cause is uninitialised data. I found innov_save will write over memory

This is puzzling me (and hampering some work, slightly): NT4SP6 + full updates server, with some printers attached. "rpcclient -U admin%pass enumdrivers 2" server gives me a list of stuff like this: [Windows 4.0] Printer Driver Info 2: Version: [0] Driver Name: [HP LaserJet 5Si PCL 5e] Architecture: [Windows 4.0] Driver Path:

This must have been an enormous pain to track down. The manual alloc routine in the TI directory (user_misc.h) clears the allocated memory, but maybe you have changed this. >> it will just start filling data in, which it shouldn't. I see that >> innov_save is set at the beginning of a for loop at: >> for (sub=0;sub<st->nbSubframes;sub++) >> { > ...