search for: totalflood

...le. Usually a few minutes with Google is all I need to solve Samba problem but not this time. Samba version: 3.0.20a I have in nsswitch.conf: passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind in smb.conf: [global] unix charset = LOCALE workgroup = TOTALFLOOD realm = TOTALFLOOD.COM netbios name = FILE-CABINET security = ADS encrypt passwords = yes lanman auth = no lm announce = no min protocol = NT1 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log level = 10 syslog = 0...

...he belongs to groups that should have access. Unless I am seriously misunderstanding the documentation at the samba.org web site. testparm shows: Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions [global] unix charset = LOCALE workgroup = TOTALFLOOD netbios name = FILE-CABINET server string = Main File Server security = DOMAIN allow trusted domains = No username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log level = 5 syslog = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50...

Hi, I've got Samba 2.0.2 and a server NT4 SP3 with Seagate BackupExec 7.0. When I want to backup Samba with Seagate BackupExec, I get a message saying "Unable to connect to server, <F5> to retry", and then another one saying "A device specific error occured". I've read all the Samba archive about that subject, but I do not find any solution. I don't

I have an FC3 intallation with samba-3.0.10-1. I cannot get it to accept a login with server=DOMAIN. I can join the domain with no problem: # net rpc join member -U scarville passwd: Joined domain TOTALFLOOD. I can browse the shares: $ smbclient -L amazon added interface ip=192.168.124.230 bcast=192.168.124.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Anonymous login successful Domain=[TOTALFLOOD] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.10-1.fc3] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- --...

...rge.net/projects/webmin-shorewal/ Anyone interested in participating please email me at enemyofthestate at users.sourceforge.net I am still learning the interface but I think I need your Sourceforge Nym to add you as a developer. -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator Nationwide-Totalflood 6033 W.Century Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-342-3602

...er. it used to load up right away and now its takes about 5-10 secs. anyone know why that is? also i see this in the logs rpc_client/cli_spoolss_notify.c:spoolss_connect_to_client Ronnie Ronald@wssource.com Thank you "Stephen Carville" <stephen@totalflood.com> wrote in message news:200302192002.02520.stephen@totalflood.com... I had the same problem after upgrading to 2.2.7. You have to add: use client driver = yes Either globally or for the individual printer share. Read the section on the above in the man page for smb.conf for an ex...

I think I''ve figured out the routing for multiple ISP''s and DNAT. For ths who might be interesed, I''ve uploaded some notes to: http://www.heronforge.net/redhat/node17.html Let me know of you see any errors or a better way... -- Stephen Carville <stephen@totalflood.com> Unix and Network Admin Nationwide Totalflood 6033 W. Century Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-342-3602

...anyway. DNAT loc net:12.47.198.108 udp 53 - 172.16.10.241 DNAT loc net:12.47.198.108 tcp 53 - 172.16.10.241 There has to be a way to get the outgoing DNS traffic to appear on 12.47.198.108 but I''m just not seeing it. -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator Nationwide-Totalflood 6033 W.Century Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-342-3602

...gt; Instead of replacing the 192.168.124.18 with 65.223.121.227, I get a source address of 209.189.103.196. Is this the correct behavior? If so how do I get the source address on outgoing packets NAT''ed to 65.223.121.227? -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator Nationwide-Totalflood 6033 W.Century Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-342-3602

on i have a small question we have a linux box with a windows 2003 server well we natted all the ports and mail is working remote desktop is working web is working the only thing that does not work is vpn how can i foward vpn traffic to this server i checked the site and searched for foward vpn and got nothen can somone please enlight me where to start Marshal McInnis Tech / Web

I am looking at terminating a OpenVPN tunnel on my shorewall box, but selectivly forward incoming traffic from the VPN tunnel to various hosts on my LOC-zone. Is this doable? Or need I set up OpenVPN tunnels that terminates on the LOC-hosts in question directly? (Or rather: Which page on the web site have I neglected to read _this_ time?) Happy new year to one and all! .

Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I have an entire /8 blacklisted. The problem is there is a single IP in > it I want to exempt from this. Searching the web site, I note there > used to be (circa version 1.3) a whitelist feature, but I couldn''t find > a simple solution to what I want to do. > > What would be the bes/easiest way to accomplish this? I can''t think of a

Hi, my problem is to access a shared printer with samba on my WindowsXP workstation When I browse thru my network with Explorer, I can see the shared printer. When I double-clic on the printer, Windows XP ask me if I want to install it. I choose the right driver and click "OK". The installation begin and there is no error in the installation. After the installation Windows XP open the

...recursive --delete --verbose $BACKUP_DIR/* \ euphrates::tigris/logarch/. Rsync is running from inetd on euphrates which has the following defined in /etc/rsyncd.conf: [tigris] uid = rsync path = /t/tigris comment = tigris oracle backup read only = false hosts allow = tigris, tigris.totalflood.com Both machines are running Solaris 8 and rsync 2.4.6. The problem is the --delete is not working. After the transfer is complete, I can do an 'ls' on the two directories and the files not on the source machine are still on the destination. Needles to say this is filling up the target...

Is it possible to allow two Linux computers to browse each other in a manner similar to the way a winbox and browse a Linux box with Samba? Ya know, like the network neighborhood thing, not the smbclient get put thing? Thanks

The network/proint controller keeps rebooting. Is this user fixable or do I have to call call service. -- Stephen Carville UNIX and Network Administrator DPSI 310-342-3602 stephen@totalflood.com -- If you have been voting for politicians who promise to give you goodies at someone else's expense, then you have no right to complain when they take your money and give it to someone else, including themselves. --Thomas Sowell (1992)

Hi, I'm having a minor issue with swat on red hat 7.2. It won't let me make any changes to the samba server (adding shares, printers, and global definitions). The buttons to access these simply don't exist. I can view status, but I can't make any changes (not even restart the daemons). This works fine on my Debian system. The only real difference that I can think of is inetd

...1 src 209.189.103.203 metric 1 default via 209.189.103.222 dev eth1 src 209.189.103.207 metric 1 default via 209.189.103.222 dev eth1 src 209.189.103.208 metric 1 default via 209.189.103.222 dev eth1 src 209.189.103.202 metric 1 -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator Nationwide-Totalflood 6033 W.Century Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-342-3602

I would like to add a rule allowing only the address 192.168.150.20 and the range of addresses from 192.169.150.100 to 192.168.150.150 in zone dmz0 to connect to two terminal servers in the local zone. Is there a syntax that can specify a range of addresses in the rules file? Do I have to enter each one separately? -- Stephen Carville Unix and Network Adminstrator DPSI 6033 W.Century Blvd.

I have defined a Home zone and placed it before the Net zone. Defined a host 192.168.174.242 as a trusted host. Now if I ping from 242 to my fw it works just fine (also tweaked the norfc1918 file). Thing I do not understand is why if I try pinging or FTPing from FW to 242 I hit the all2all reject rule ! I tried reading the rules and from the INPUT chain I see a eth0_in chain which in turn