Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "total_error_x".
Did you mean:
total_error_3
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: 0.9 problems
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 06:42:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I think this could be fixed by changing the (data_len > 0) test to be
> (data_len > 0 && total_error_X > 0).
Yes, this appears to have worked. I can now correctly encode and decode both
my 8kHz/8-bit/mono sample, and a 44.1kHz/16-bit/stereo sample on Debian/alpha.
Attached is a patch which combines this fix with my earlier patch.
--
- mdz
-------------- next part --------------
--- fixed.c.o...
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: 0.9 problems
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> 0.9. As I said, I was using an 8-bit sample,
Ah, that didn't quite register with me. I'm using a CD-style
44.1kHz/stereo/16-bit test file.
> to avoid dealing with endian issues in the file format. I don't
> know whether any of those exist or not.
I don't think so. 0.9 works fine on i386 (little) and sparc (big),
and
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: 0.9 problems
...tion. Here's a small test
program:
#include <math.h>
int main() {
double foo = log((double)0);
printf("%e\n", foo);
printf("%e\n", foo / M_LN2);
return 0;
}
I think this could be fixed by changing the (data_len > 0) test to be (data_len
> 0 && total_error_X > 0).
--
- mdz