Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "total_devic".
Did you mean:
total_devices
2013 Aug 16
2
[PATCH] xfstests: update filters and output of btrfs/006
The btrfs-progs tools changed the output:
- 100GiB instead of 100GB
- The number of spaces was changed
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
---
common/filter | 2 +-
common/filter.btrfs | 3 ++-
tests/btrfs/006 | 6 +++---
tests/btrfs/006.out | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
2010 Dec 05
1
[PATCH 4/5][REPOST][BTRFS-PROGS] Avoid to scan cdrom and floppy
Hi all,
the commands "btrfs filesystem show" and "btrfs device scan" look at the /dev
directory (and it subdirectories) for every block devices.
This is a slow process because floppy and cdrom are also checked. Moreover,
as highlighted by Helmut, if udev is not used, the /dev directory is populated
by high number of non-existant devices, which slow the process.
My patch
2012 May 07
0
[PATCH V2] btrfs: fix message printing
Fix various messages to include newline and module prefix.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 8 ++++----
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 +++---
fs/btrfs/zlib.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index c5f8fca..c0b8727 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++
2011 Jul 18
5
[PATCH v3 0/5] btrfs-progs: scrub interface
This is the next patch series for scrub userland tools.
Change log v1->v2:
- commands now reachable as "btrfs scrub ..." instead of "btrfs filesystem
scrub ..."
- ability to scrub a single device instead of a whole file system
- superfluous command line options removed
- resume is now a separate command ("scrub resume") instead of "scrub start -r"
-
2011 Jan 22
32
Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Hi,
I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups.
When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting
"error checking /dev/loop2 mount status"
With strace I see where the problem is:
lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par",
0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
The problem is there is something missing
2010 Sep 03
0
[PATCH 1/2] btrfs: document where we use BUG_ON instead of error handling
Document those places in the btrfs code which are BUGing on non-fatal error
conditions that should be handled by proper error paths. This makes it
easier to distinguish between what needs fixing versus which BUG_ON''s we
might want to keep (to trap code bugs, unexpected inconsistencies, etc).
Do this with a trivial macro, ''btrfs_fixable_bug_on'' which just defines to