search for: torproject

...Anyone know what the deal is with that? Some objection, or >> forgotten flag day, or oversight that really should be set to 1? >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=133720 _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays at lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

...g. I'm certain that a certain amount of private > information leaks out when I'm browsing forums or catching up with the > news, but unfortunately, that's the tax you pay when you use the web. Speaking of privacy... I would recommend people to check out tor project: https://www.torproject.org/ they have nice browser (codebase of which is Mozila Firefox, - they didn't find better workhorse yet...). One privacy aspect that wasn't mentioned here is you internet provider being able to see your traffic (destination at least) and analyze that. This is what tor project helps with...

...historical interest due to huge slowdown/memory />/consumption. / I can assure you that they are still widely used for QA :) >/Are you looking for bug detection mechanisms, or also for production />/hardening techniques? />/ASan is a bug detection tool. ASan can />/<https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-browser-55a4-hardened-released> be />/used for hardening, but that's not it's primary purpose. />/Same is true (IMHO) about Pointer Checker and SoftBound. />//>/Hardening is an entirely different subject, although there is a bit of />/intersection, />/e.g....

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, mj wrote: > What we do is: use https://github.com/trick77/ipset-blacklist to block IPs > (from various existing blacklists) at the iptables level using an ipset. "www.blocklist.de" is a nifty source. Could you suggest other publically available blacklists? > That way, the known bad IPs never even talk to dovecot, but are dropped > immediately. We

On 10/23/18 2:49 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > On Sun, 2018-10-14 at 20:13 +0200, Robin Lee wrote: >> I've just encountered a problem starting tor. When I do 'systemctl >> start tor' it fails and I get selinux errors in the log. There was >> suggestion to do full auditing with 'auditctl -w /etc/shadow -p w'. >> Which I did and it gave the following >>

Hola Puedes encontrar libros gratuitos y de pago googleando "library genesis", en ese sitio encontraras libros de pago en forma gratuita hay bastantes libros de muchas especialidades, R incluido, solo tienes q tomarte tu tiempo en buscar. Edgar. > El 17 feb. 2017, a las 06:51, Francisco Rodriguez Sanchez <f.rodriguez.sanc en gmail.com> escribió: > > Buenos días

On 06/12/2015 11:57 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:55:47AM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> The most offensive problems of using browsers is that >> they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts >> spy on your entire storage contents. > Huh? You've been misinformed. Certainly there have been exploits > against browsers to bypass

Hey everyone , I'm using tinc from iran , and i've been using tinc with tcponly for a few years now , to bypass the filtering , and have access to the free internet , but recently , our government started to apply some sort of exotic filtering scheme , they've completely blocked outgoing and incoming ssh requests , and ssl encrypted packets , and the only thing allowed is https !! ,

On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >>>> that is not viewable by the user. >>>> The whitelist tab does NOT

Dmitrii, all, Please note, that GCC 5.3 had a significant update to the MPX code quality - please, use this version as reference. Regards, Sergos On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb

Greetings everyone! I would like to know if adding support for Unix socket to sshd would be a feature that would be consider to be added upstream? (ListenAddress). One of the main reason for this question to you all is that tor now has Unix socket support for hidden services that is traffic of a hidden service can be forwarded to a Unix socket (see HiddenServicePort in tor.1). The rationale

Hi, we are seeing sometimes hangs using rsync 3.0.9 on Ubuntu 12.04 machines. The commands that cause these hangs are rsync -aL firefox ../../dist/TorBrowser.app/Contents/MacOS or rsync -a --exclude "*.in" /home/ubuntu/build/tor-browser/browser/app/macbuild/Contents/Resources/English.lproj/ ../../dist/TorBrowser.app/Contents/Resources/en.lproj lsof output is: --------------- rsync

On 04 Feb (10:46:55), Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-02-04 07:40:39 -0500, David Goulet wrote: > > > I would like to know if adding support for Unix socket to sshd would be a > > feature that would be consider to be added upstream? (ListenAddress). > > fwiw, i think this is a good idea, but i wouldn't implement it as an > explicit ListenAddress option: