Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "torcz".
Did you mean:
torch
2010 Aug 31
2
Question about specific patch (eMMC)
Hello all,
Is there any patches for btrfs to use enhanced area in eMMC (it will
allow to boost performance i.e. it very useful to keep metadata within
this area) ?
If it''s exist let me know how to find it and use it.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
2012 Jun 08
2
btrfs filesystems can only be mounted after an unclean shutdown if btrfsck is run and immediately killed!
Hi all,
I have two multi-disk btrfs filesystems on a Arch linux 3.4.0 system.
After a power failure, both filesystems refuse to mount
[ 10.402284] Btrfs loaded
[ 10.402714] device fsid 1e7c18a4-02d6-44b1-8eaf-c01378009cd3 devid 4
transid 65282 /dev/sdc
[ 10.403108] btrfs: force zlib compression
[ 10.403130] btrfs: enabling inode map caching
[ 10.403152] btrfs: disk space caching is
2012 May 17
6
SSD format/mount parameters questions
For using SSDs:
Are there any format/mount parameters that should be set for using btrfs
on SSDs (other than the "ssd" mount option)?
General questions:
How long is the ''delay'' for the delayed alloc?
Are file allocations aligned to 4kiB boundaries, or larger?
What byte value is used to pad unused space?
(Aside: For some, the erased state reads all 0x00, and for
2012 May 04
1
BTRFS RAID
Greetings,
I have a few questions pertaining to BTRFS RAID. I know it''s been rumored a lot recently that kernel 3.4 will have RAID5/6 support, is this still the case. Also, is it possible to change from a single drive system to a raid system or even a multi drive system without raid to a raid system while there is data on the drives an successfully convert them without loosing data?
2013 Feb 02
1
cannot mount with acl
Hello,
btrfs is failing to mount if I use the mount option acl.
I am running debian testing with a debian experimental version of kernel
3.7.3:
uname -a
Linux nimby 3.7-trunk-486 #1 Debian 3.7.3-1~experimental.1 i686 GNU/Linux
from fstab
LABEL=btrfs-exthd /mnt/exthd btrfs defaults,noatime,compress=zlib,acl
0 2
from dmesg
[ 14.785716] device label btrfs-exthd devid 1 transid
2013 Feb 04
1
Does btrfs adapt to size changes of underlying block device(s)?
Hello,
I''ve got a quick question: Does btrfs adapt to size changes of the
underlying block device(s)?
My specific situation is as follows: I''ve got a luks-volume on which I
want to put btrfs. If this luks-volume grows in the future (i.e. by
''cryptsetup resize''), will btrfs automatically (and reliably) "see" this
and be able to use the additional
2010 Apr 16
2
[RFC] btrfs, udev and btrfs
Hi all,
below a configuration for udev/initramfs which I propose to scan the block
devices looking for a multi-volume btrfs filesystem.
Btrfs has the capability to span a file-system on multiple device. In order to
do that, the involved devices have to be "registered" in the kernel.
In order to do that there are two options:
# btrfs device scan <device> (or the old
2008 Sep 21
7
snapshot merging?
At the beginning of August, Mikulas Patocka posted to linux-kernel
mailing list about adding snapshot merging to LVM[1].
Basicaly, snapshot merging means that it is possible to turn a snapshot
back into its origin.
Using LVM, however, means that you need to have free place outside of
the filesystem (i.e., in physical volume) to make snapshots, which is
not always possible on workstations and
2009 Aug 06
10
RAID[56] status
If we''ve abandoned the idea of putting the number of redundant blocks
into the top bits of the type bitmask (and I hope we have), then we''re
fairly much there. Current code is at:
git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git
git://, http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-progs-raid56.git
We have recovery working, as well as both full-stripe writes
2011 Jan 05
52
Offline Deduplication for Btrfs
Here are patches to do offline deduplication for Btrfs. It works well for the
cases it''s expected to, I''m looking for feedback on the ioctl interface and
such, I''m well aware there are missing features for the userspace app (like
being able to set a different blocksize). If this interface is acceptable I
will flesh out the userspace app a little more, but I believe the