search for: toptygin

The following (occuring on debian/testing with kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386 version 2.6.8-13 and iproute version 20041019-3) confuses me: # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: proto ip pref 1 handle 1 fw classid 1:2 # tc filter ls dev eth0 filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 fw filter parent 1: protocol ip pref 1 fw handle 0x1 classid 1:2 # tc filter del dev

Hi, it seems that "ip address delete" will delete all addresses of the same class on an interface if it is ordered to only delete the first one: # ip a f eth0 # ip a l eth0 3: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx # ip a a 192.168.a.b brd + dev eth0 # ip a a 192.168.c.d brd + dev eth0 # ip a d 192.168.a.b brd + dev

I've set up a Samba 3.0.6-3 (Debian/testing) server as a member of a Win2k ADS domain. Everything is working fine, except for 3 nagging issues: 1) For some reason, although I have: map to guest = Bad User guest account = stguest people who give bad user names get mapped to `nobody` (as seen by ps -ef). stguest has a valid entry in /etc/passwd (with no password and shell /bin/false)

Server : eth0 - internet DSL eth1 - LAN wlan0 - wireles LAN I want server to share bandwith from eth0 evenly for users on eth1 and wlan0. How can i make it ? Is it possible ? As far as i know htb splits outgoing bandwith on one device only. ---------------------------------------------------- Grypa? Damy radę! Sprawdź jak jej zapowbiegać, a jeśli już za późno ...jak leczyć - grypa.wp.pl

Hi all. I would need to use a single physical interface on a Linux box to manage two different IP addresses (belonging to two separate logical subnets) with two different MAC address. (I need to emulate te presence of two separate physical interfaceses for a PC on the same LAN, at layer 2 and layer 3). Is it possible to use the linux ethernet bridging code and two tap interfaces for this

Hello, Ive had a poke around through various linux routing documents, but haven''t found what I think is an elegant solution to a routing issue I''m having with a hosting provider and RHEL ES 4 running in a VMware VM. Here''s a diagram of the situation : Default route at provider our host (A) 72.3.230.1/26 ---- 72.3.230.30/26 the VM (B)

Hey all, I recently read on a prior post as well as the FAQ that packets can be limited by mac address using the u32 filter. I attempted this and, while all the commands went through with no errors, it is not limiting at all. I''m attempting to limit all IP traffic to a specific destination mac address (00:12:3f:05:43:7f). Here is a quick rundown of the commands

I have a setup that looks roughly like: # cat smb.conf [global] security = ads workgroup = company realm = internal.company.com password server = 192.168.1.2 netbios name = server server string = Samba Server name resolve order = wins bcast username map = /etc/samba/smbusers map to guest = Bad User invalid

Trying again, after re-subscribing: On 11/20/06, Bob Beers <bob.beers@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I want to dynamically create DNAT rules for > RTP streams (port-mapping for a SIP proxy). > > If my proxy adds the rule before the first packet > of the RTP stream hits the port, all is well. But, if > the stream begins arriving before my rule is in > place,