search for: topts

Hello, I'm trying to adjust a non linear model in which the biological response variable (ratio of germinated fungus spores) is dependent on 2 covariates (temperature and time). The response to temperature is modeled by a kind of beta function with 2 parameters (optimal and maximum temperatures) and the time function is a 2-parameter Weibull. Adjustments with nls or gnls work, but I need to

Hi, I have R 2.6.0 with updated lme4 and Matrix packages, and I am trying to fit a nonlinear multilevel model. I get the following error message: Error in nlmer(f ~ grModel(x, w, Tmin, Tmax, Topt, kopt, m) ~ kopt | flat, : gradient attribute of evaluated model must be a numeric matrix and I wonder what this may indicate. The nonlinear model I try to fit is as follows: > grModel

...module like this:      llvm::SmallVector<std::string,2> mattrs;      llvm::EngineBuilder builder{ unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(module) };      llvm::ExecutionEngine * ee = builder.         setErrorStr( &errStr ).         setEngineKind( llvm::EngineKind::JIT ).         setTargetOptions( topts ).         create(builder.selectTarget( llvm::Triple(llvm::Triple::normalize(platform::target->triple)), "", "", mattrs ));     module->setDataLayout( ee->getDataLayout() ); Where `module` is my `llvm::Module` with the generated IR code. I'm using the triple `x86...

...lectTarget(...); Or you could just let EngineBuilder call selectTarget for you (which is what the no-argument version of EngineBuilder::create does): llvm::ExecutionEngine * ee = builder. setErrorStr( &errStr ). setEngineKind( llvm::EngineKind::JIT ). setTargetOptions( topts ). setMArch(arch). setMAttrs(mattrs). create(); If those are still failing, it would be interesting to get the data layout string that you are getting from the ExecutionEngine instance and compare it to what you are expecting. Cheers, Lang. On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:56 AM...

...lvm::SmallVector<std::string,2> mattrs; >      llvm::EngineBuilder builder{ unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(module) }; >      llvm::ExecutionEngine * ee = builder. >         setErrorStr( &errStr ). >         setEngineKind( llvm::EngineKind::JIT ). >         setTargetOptions( topts ). >         create(builder.selectTarget( > llvm::Triple(llvm::Triple::normalize(platform::target->triple)), "", "", > mattrs )); > >     module->setDataLayout( ee->getDataLayout() ); > > Where `module` is my `llvm::Module` with the generated IR cod...

My code to create an ExecutionEngine is segfaulting: std::string errStr; llvm::ExecutionEngine * ee = llvm::EngineBuilder( unique_ptr<llvm::Module>(module) ) .setErrorStr( &errStr ) //line 1618 .setEngineKind( llvm::EngineKind::JIT ) Where module is a `llvm::Module*`. This is code I'm migrating from 3.3 to 3.8. Since the deletion error is happening during

...mount of shell-fu (not clever "tricks", but actual "how to make a robust, readable, portable shell script"-fu) in there that you will want to imitate. > LLVMHOME=/home/projects/llvm/upstream/llvm-trunk-build/Release+Asserts/bin > SOPTS="-generate-ppc-fp128" > TOPTS="-mtriple=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu -mcpu=pwr7" Hardcoding these seems a bit "wrong". Are there any reasonable defaults we can use? ((pwd, empty, host triple) for the three options, respectively, might be reasonable?). -- Sean Silva On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Hal Fi...

From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> COM32/rosh: Improvements; ls acts more like ls with -l -i and -F being understood; Lots of code clean up and user assistance. Clean up the MCONFIG file; Clean up the code to get it to pass checkpatch.pl (aside from confusion on multi-line strings); Add a little more in the error function to recognize different errors; Signed-off-by: Gene Cumm

A few people have requested features; I've implemented them in this updated version (attached). Do you think this is worth putting in the repo somewhere? -Hal ----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > I wrote a small script in order to stress test llc using test cases > generated by llvm-stress. When it finds a case where llc seems to > have crashed, it greps the output for

...make a robust, readable, portable shell script"-fu) > in there that you will want to imitate. Sounds good. I'll look at it. > > > > > LLVMHOME=/home/projects/llvm/upstream/llvm-trunk-build/Release+Asserts/bin > > SOPTS="-generate-ppc-fp128" > > TOPTS="-mtriple=powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu -mcpu=pwr7" > > > Hardcoding these seems a bit "wrong". Are there any reasonable > defaults we can use? ((pwd, empty, host triple) for the three > options, respectively, might be reasonable?). Sure ;) -- I did not mean to i...

...:desc("Run LTO passes using the new pass manager"), cl::init(false), cl::Hidden); ... Conf.UseNewPM = UseNewPM; ... projects/clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp ... void clang::EmitBackendOutput( (...) { ... runThinLTOBackend(CombinedIndex.get(), M, HeaderOpts, CGOpts, TOpts, LOpts, std::move(OS), CGOpts.SampleProfileFile, Action); return; ... } static void runThinLTOBackend (...) { ... Conf.UseNewPM = CGOpts.ExperimentalNewPassManager; ... } My team and I were wondering if this is: intentional, if so, why do we not have an...

Hi, I wrote a small script in order to stress test llc using test cases generated by llvm-stress. When it finds a case where llc seems to have crashed, it greps the output for Assertion, LLVM ERROR, etc., removes things that look like hex numbers and ID numbers, and then checksums the resulting text. In this way, it can automatically categorize different bugs into different subdirectories. I

Without further adieu, I would like to announce that I've finally pushed ROSH, the Read-Only SHell, finally to the point of being reasonably usable. From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> Patch ROSH for Syslinux-4 and make it much more usable. Signed-off-by: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> --- diff --git a/com32/rosh/rosh.c b/com32/rosh/rosh.c index 511fdff..bf1176f

Hi, Could you share how you compile IR and which version of JIT you use (Orc, MCJIT)? Could it be that you are using interpreter instead of actual JIT? Cheers, Alex. > On 5. May 2018, at 08:04, edA-qa mort-ora-y via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being > rather slow. It's accounting for

I'm having issues of my compiler, and JIT execution, of LLVM IR being rather slow. It's accounting for the vast majority of my full compilation time.  I'm trying to figure out why this is happening, since it's becoming an impediment.  (Note: by slow I mean about 3s of time for only about 2K of my front-end code, 65K lines of LLVM-IR) Using valgrind I see some functions which seem

...per::EmitAssembly (this=0x7fffffffb7a8, Action=clang::Backend_EmitObj, OS=...) at /work/Abe/non-backup-worthy/build_dirs/Clang/pre-3.9/2016-07-17-22-54-42-1cb1a4c-master/llvm/tools/cfe/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:734 #14 0x0000000002adeda6 in clang::EmitBackendOutput (Diags=..., CGOpts=..., TOpts=..., LOpts=..., TDesc=..., M=0x82b1f90, Action=clang::Backend_EmitObj, OS=...) at /work/Abe/non-backup-worthy/build_dirs/Clang/pre-3.9/2016-07-17-22-54-42-1cb1a4c-master/llvm/tools/cfe/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:751 #15 0x00000000035d622f in clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationU...

...; at >>>>> /local/mnt/workspace/slarin/tools/llvm-mainline- >>>> merged/tools/clang/lib/CodeG >>>>> en/BackendUtil.cpp:497 >>>>> #11 0x0000000000c94968 in clang::EmitBackendOutput (Diags=..., >>>> CGOpts=..., >>>>> TOpts=..., LOpts=..., M=0x3d1a3c0, >>>> Action=clang::Backend_EmitAssembly, >>>>> OS=0x3d13660) >>>>> at >>>>> /local/mnt/workspace/slarin/tools/llvm-mainline- >>>> merged/tools/clang/lib/CodeG >>>>> en/BackendUtil.cpp:5...

Dear all, In the process of trying to add optimization for better layout of global variables, I have run up against a roadblock: I don`t seem to be able to sort the contents of a "SymbolTableListTraits<GlobalVariable>" -- or even swap two elements in that list -- without causing LLVM to crash. I have tried writing a comparator class and then using "llvm::iplist<