search for: topsy

...ord and then do an exchange with the given password. It does the same thing if PLAIN authentication is used. I'm starting to suspect MS deliberately hobbled outlook so that it uses the SSPI to exchange an entered password but not ever the logon credentials.. Does anyone know different? What a topsy-turvy world when thunderbird using SSPI works better on Windows than outlook. :| Thanks, Jason

...0.0.0.0. Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in use. Cannot bind any address. # ^D This seems... counterintuitive, at least. Is it the intended behaviour? -- ``Around 1,500 spectators turned up,... lured by the novel combination of death, an elephant and electricity. Mercifully, Topsy died extremely quickly, and without a trumpet, which may have had something to do with the carrots laced with cyanide that she had been fed.'' (from The Economist)

...y-v4 k8s-nfproxy-sep-TMVEFT7EX55F4T62 update @sticky-set-svc-M53CN2XYVUHRQ7UB { ip saddr timeout 30s : 2 } I tried to use Mark instead of integer for Key/Value of the set, same result with invalid value. I am running Ubuntu 19.10, with kernel: 5.4.15-050415-generic nft --version nftables v0.9.3 (Topsy) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20200204/72c76ae7/attachment.html>

...t 0x00004000 return } } the command to add rule to k8s-nat-mark-masq chain is: sudo nft add rule ipv4table k8s-nat-mark-masq ip protocol . ip daddr . th dport vmap @cluster-ip-services-set It does not fail but sudo nft list table ipv4table shows incorrect rule. nft -version nftables v0.9.3 (Topsy) Debug output: ip ipv4table k8s-nat-mark-masq [ payload load 1b @ network header + 9 => reg 1 ] [ payload load 4b @ network header + 16 => reg 9 ] [ payload load 2b @ transport header + 2 => reg 10 ] [ lookup reg 1 set cluster-ip-services-set dreg 0 ] ---------------- ------...

Hai Marco, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Marco Gaiarin [mailto:gaio at sv.lnf.it] > Verzonden: donderdag 11 oktober 2018 14:15 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] NFSv4, homes, Kerberos... > > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle > In chel di` si favelave... > > > If you want to test the module, i have a set ready to test. > > Ahe,

...file = /var/log/samba/byHost/log.%I deadtime = 15 load printers = No preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No ldap ssl = no default service = cmn$ NIS homedir = Yes follow symlinks = No [cmn$] path = /topsys/cmn/%S read only = No Directly on the solarisserver with the smbclient tool , or on the windows desktop same result : In the directory CLST.WRH, the existing directory CGND.WRH is not displayed. [root] solarisserver # smbclient -U myuser //solarisserver/mfd Password: Domain=[WORKGROUP]...

...ssignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter: herecomeswaynebao0811 at gmail.com Hey there, I found this bug when I am using https://github.com/ansibleguy/python3-nftables on a redhat 8. The kernel version "Linux 4.18.0-372.9.1.el8.x86_64 x86_64", nft version "nftables v0.9.3 (Topsy)" basically, when I use a set of ips with prefix len to create a rule, some ips show different prefix vs. my input when i "list chain ip filter test_chain". More details: bug itself: This is the set of ips i want to set as daddr: {'set': [{'prefix': {'addr'...

(resent) >> On 11/05/2020 15:24, L. van Belle via samba wrote: >>> For all Debian 10 people and strange things after upgrade of debian. >>> apt remove apparmor > I already replied that it isn't installed at all. Any other ideas? Am I the only one with Debian 10.4 and samba seeing this behavior? thx

...t the second command set into two separate calls to nft. First to flush the set. Then a second action to re-populate. However, I really expect the flush to work. Comments: An attempt to delete one element of an auto-merged element fails. I think that this is reasonable. # nft -v nftables v0.9.3 (Topsy) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20200203/9cbb8737/attachment.html>

...goto do_reject } Error: Could not process rule: Invalid argument add element ipv4table no-endpoints-services { tcp . 192.168.80.104 . 8989 : goto do_reject } ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` nft -version nftables v0.9.3 (Topsy) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20200106/e72e11a0/attachment.html>